Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery
- PMID: 38833111
- PMCID: PMC11150305
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01984-w
Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery
Abstract
Remote surgery provides opportunity for enhanced surgical capabilities, wider healthcare reach, and potentially improved patient outcomes. The network reliability is the foundation of successful implementation of telesurgery. It relies on a robust, high-speed communication network, with ultra-low latency. Significant lag has been shown to endanger precision and safety. Furthermore, the full-fledged adoption of telerobotics demands careful consideration of ethical challenges too. A deep insight into these issues has been investigated during the first Telesurgery Consensus Conference that took place in Orlando, Florida, USA, on the 3rd and 4th of February, 2024. During the Conference, the state of the art of remote surgery has been reported from robotic systems displaying telesurgery potential. The Hinotori, a robotic-assisted surgery platform developed by Medicaroid, experienced remote surgery as pre-clinical testing only; the Edge Medical Company, Shenzen, China, reported more than one hundred animal and 30 live human surgeries; the KanGuo reported human telesurgical cases performed with distances more than 3000 km; the Microport, China, collected more than 100 human operations at a distance up to 5000 km. Though, several issues-cybersecurity, data privacy, technical malfunctions - are yet to be addressed before a successful telesurgery implementation. Expanding the discussion to encompass ethical, financial, regulatory, and legal considerations is essential too. The Telesurgery collaborative community is working together to address and establish the best practices in the field.
Keywords: Latency; Network structure; Remote surgery; Robotic surgery; Telesurgery.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Current perspectives of telesurgery applications among different specialties: first multicentric and multispecialty retrospective study.J Robot Surg. 2025 May 28;19(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02393-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40434479
-
Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery.J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 17;18(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01797-3. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38231309 Review.
-
Telesurgery: current status and strategies for latency reduction.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 12;19(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02333-1. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40220039 Review.
-
Telesurgery: humanitarian and surgical benefits while navigating technologic and administrative challenges.J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 5;18(1):393. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02156-6. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 39499368
-
Expanding Surgical Frontiers Across the Pacific Ocean: Insights from the First Telesurgery Procedures Connecting Orlando with Shanghai in Animal Models.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Oct 21;70:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.09.009. eCollection 2024 Dec. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39502103 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Advancing Telesurgery Connectivity Between North and South America: the first Remote Surgery Conducted Between Orlando and São Paulo in Animal Models.Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Jan-Feb;51(1):e20240601. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0601. Int Braz J Urol. 2025. PMID: 39556854 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Telesurgery unleashed: redefining surgical presence in the age of intelligent robotics.J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):455. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02634-5. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40768173 No abstract available.
-
The legal and ethical considerations in cross-border telesurgical procedures.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 12;87(6):3660-3672. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003344. eCollection 2025 Jun. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40486583 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Feasibility and Initial Outcomes of Telesurgery in Urology: a Systematic Review of the Literature.Int Braz J Urol. 2025 May-Jun;51(3):e20240494. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0494. Int Braz J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40079922 Free PMC article.
-
Current perspectives of telesurgery applications among different specialties: first multicentric and multispecialty retrospective study.J Robot Surg. 2025 May 28;19(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02393-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40434479
References
-
- Patel V, Saikali S, Moschovas MC, Patel E, Satava R, Dasgupta P, Dohler M, Collins JW, Albala D, Marescaux J (2024) Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery. J Robot Surg 18(1):40. 10.1007/s11701-023-01797-3 - PubMed
-
- Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H (2005) Establishment of the world’s first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg 241(3):460–464. 10.1097/01.sla.0000154456.69815.ee - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nguan C, Miller B, Patel R, Luke PP, Schlachta CM (2008) Pre-clinical remote telesurgery trial of a da Vinci telesurgery prototype. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4:304–309. 10.1002/rcs.210 - PubMed
-
- Gamal A, Moschovas MC, Jaber AR, Saikali S, Perera R, Headley C, Patel E, Rogers T, Roche MW, Leveillee RJ, Albala D, Patel V (2024) Clinical applications of robotic surgery platforms: a comprehensive review. J Robot Surg 18(1):29. 10.1007/s11701-023-01815-4. (PMID: 38231279) - PubMed
-
- Lum MJH, Rosen J, Lendvay TS, Wright AS, Sinanan MN, Hannaford B (2008) TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay - pilot study. 2008 30th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada. pp. 5597-5600, Doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650483 - PubMed