Use of malaria rapid diagnostic test and anti-malarial drug prescription practices among primary healthcare workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria: An analytical cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38833491
- PMCID: PMC11149890
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304600
Use of malaria rapid diagnostic test and anti-malarial drug prescription practices among primary healthcare workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria: An analytical cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: The recommendation of universal diagnostic testing before malaria treatment aimed to address the problem of over-treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy and the heightened risk of selection pressure and drug resistance and the use of malaria rapid diagnostic test (MRDT) was a key strategy, particularly among primary healthcare (PHC) workers whose access to and use of other forms of diagnostic testing were virtually absent. However, the use of MRDT can only remedy over-treatment when health workers respond appropriately to negative MRDT results by not prescribing anti-malarial drugs. This study assessed the use of MRDT and anti-malarial drug prescription practices, and the predictors, among PHC workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.
Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional questionnaire survey, among consenting PHC workers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of malaria, from January 15, 2020 to February 5, 2020. Data was collected via structured self-administered questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariate generalized estimating equations.
Results: Of the 490 participants surveyed: 81.4% usually/routinely used MRDT for malaria diagnosis and 18.6% usually used only clinical symptoms; 78.0% used MRDT for malaria diagnosis for all/most of their patients suspected of having malaria in the preceding month while 22.0% used MRDT for none/few/some; 74.9% had good anti-malarial drug prescription practice; and 68.0% reported appropriate response to negative MRDT results (never/rarely prescribed anti-malarial drugs for the patients) while 32.0% reported inappropriate response (sometimes/often/always prescribed anti-malarial drugs). The identified predictor(s): of the use of MRDT was working in health facilities supported by the United States' President's Malaria Initiative (PMI-supported health facilities); of good anti-malarial drug prescription practice were having good opinion about MRDT, having good knowledge about malaria diagnosis and MRDT, being a health attendant, working in PMI-supported health facilities, and increase in age; and of appropriate response to negative MRDT results was having good opinion about MRDT.
Conclusions: The evidence indicate the need for, and highlight factors to be considered by, further policy actions and interventions for optimal use of MRDT and anti-malarial drug prescription practices among the PHC workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria, and similar settings.
Copyright: © 2024 Omale et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative study on determinants of the use of malaria rapid diagnostic test and anti-malarial drug prescription practices by primary healthcare workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.Malar J. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04958-3. Malar J. 2024. PMID: 38664678 Free PMC article.
-
Health workers' perception of malaria rapid diagnostic test and factors influencing compliance with test results in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223869. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31622398 Free PMC article.
-
Practice of antimalarial prescription to patients with negative rapid test results and associated factors among health workers in Oyo State, Nigeria.Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Jul 26;30:229. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.229.13231. eCollection 2018. Pan Afr Med J. 2018. PMID: 30574247 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing health workers' adherence to malaria treatment guidelines in under-five children in Nigeria: A scoping review.Malariaworld J. 2024 Oct 15;15:11. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13934643. eCollection 2024. Malariaworld J. 2024. PMID: 39502332 Free PMC article.
-
The malarial blood transcriptome: translational applications.Biochem Soc Trans. 2024 Apr 24;52(2):651-660. doi: 10.1042/BST20230497. Biochem Soc Trans. 2024. PMID: 38421063 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- WHO. World malaria report 2022. Geneva; World Health Organization; 2022.
-
- WHO. WHO Guidelines for malaria, 14 March 2023. Geneva; World Health Organization; 2023.
-
- WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. Geneva; World Health Organization; 2015.
-
- National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP) [Nigeria], National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria], and ICF. Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2021 Final Report. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NMEP, NPC, and ICF; 2022.
-
- WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3rd ed. Geneva; World Health Organization; 2015. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical