Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;103(8):103879.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103879. Epub 2024 May 17.

Effects of residual feed intake on the economic traits of fast-growing meat ducks

Affiliations

Effects of residual feed intake on the economic traits of fast-growing meat ducks

Hongxiang Liu et al. Poult Sci. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Feed efficiency (FE) is a crucial economic indicator of meat duck production. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of residual feed intake (RFI), defined as the difference between the actual and expected feed intake based on animal's production and maintenance requirements, on the growth performance (GP), slaughter and internal organ characteristics of fast-growing meat ducks. In total, 1,300 healthy 14-day-old male fast-growing meat ducks were housed in individual cages until slaughter at the age of 35 d. The characteristics of the carcass and internal organs of 30 ducks with the highest RFI (HRFI) and the lowest RFI (LRFI) were respectively determined. RFI, the feed conversion ratio (FCR), and average day feed intake (ADFI) were significantly lower in the LRFI group than the HRFI group (P < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in marketing BW or BW gain (BWG) (P > 0.05). The thigh muscle and lean meat yields were higher, and the abdominal fat content was lower (P < 0.001) in the LRFI group, while there were no significant differences in other carcass traits between the groups (P > 0.05). The liver and gizzard yields were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the LRFI group, while there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in intestinal length between the groups. RFI was highly positively correlate with FCR and ADFI (P < 0.01), but negatively correlated the yields of thigh muscle, lean meat, liver, and gizzard, and positively correlated with abdominal fat content. These results indicate that selection for low RFI could improve the FE of fast-growing meat ducks without affecting the marketing BW and BWG, while increasing yields of thigh muscle and lean meat and reducing abdominal fat content. These findings offer useful insights into the biological processes that influence FE of fast-growing meat ducks.

Keywords: correlation analysis; fast-growing meat duck; feed efficiency; production performance; residual feed intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aggrey S.E., Karnuah A.B., Sebastian B., Anthony N.B. Genetic properties of feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2010;42:25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai H., Guo Q., Yang B., Dong Z., Li X., Song Q., Jiang Y., Wang Z., Chang G., Chen G. Effects of residual feed intake divergence on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and blood biochemical parameters in small-sized meat ducks. Poult. Sci. 2022;101 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basarab J.A., Price M.A., Aalhus J.L., Okine E.K., Snelling W.M., Lyle K.L. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;83:189–204.
    1. Byerly T.C., Kessler J.W., Gous R.M., Thomas O.P. Feed requirements for egg production. Poult. Sci. 1980;59:2500–2507.
    1. Drouilhet L., Achard C.S., Zemb O., Molette C., Gidenne T., Larzul C., Ruesche J., Tircazes A., Segura M., Bouchez T., Theau-Clément M., Joly T., Balmisse E., Garreau H., Gilbert H. Direct and correlated responses to selection in two lines of rabbits selected for feed efficiency under ad libitum and restricted feeding: I. Production traits and gut microbiota characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:38–48. - PubMed