Lower Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates with Vaginal Endometrin Plus Intramuscular Progesterone Every Third Day Versus Intramuscular Progesterone Alone in Programmed Frozen Embryo Transfers: A Retrospective Case-control Study
- PMID: 38834840
- DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01600-0
Lower Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates with Vaginal Endometrin Plus Intramuscular Progesterone Every Third Day Versus Intramuscular Progesterone Alone in Programmed Frozen Embryo Transfers: A Retrospective Case-control Study
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether the use of vaginal Endometrin plus intramuscular progesterone on every third day (VIM) in programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with lower pregnancy and live birth rates compared to daily intramuscular progesterone (IM). FET data from a single program were collected between November 2018 and December 2021. A total of 903 FETs were analyzed, including 504 FETs in the IM group, and 399 FETs in the VIM group. Inclusion criteria were women undergoing FETs with either 50 mg daily IM progesterone only (control) or 200 mg Endometrin twice daily plus 50 mg IM progesterone on every third day, with the transfer of a single day 5 or 6 frozen embryo. There were no significant differences in patient age at time of FETs, BMI, endometrial thickness, blastocyst quality, or infertility diagnosis between the groups. The VIM had significantly lower positive hCG and clinical pregnancy rates compared to the IM (60.2% vs 72.0% and 40.6% vs 56.7%, respectively, P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001). The live birth rate was 36.1% in the VIM, compared to 49.4% in the IM (P < 0.0001). These findings also remained significant when excluding FETs with donor egg (35.9% vs 50.1%, P < 0.0001). This study demonstrated that VIM in FET cycles yields significantly lower pregnancy and live birth rates compared to IM along. IM progesterone alone may be preferable to combined Endometrin and IM progesterone in patients undergoing programmed frozen embryo transfers.
Keywords: Endometrin; Frozen embryo transfer; IVF outcome; Intramuscular progesterone; Pregnancy rate.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Competing Interests: On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial.Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.004. Epub 2018 Jan 17. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29338855 Clinical Trial.
-
Intramuscular progesterone optimizes live birth from programmed frozen embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial.Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):633-643. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 May 13. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33992421 Clinical Trial.
-
Individualized luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer after intramuscular progesterone administration might rectify live birth rate.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 28;15:1412185. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1412185. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39006366 Free PMC article.
-
Sublingual progesterone lozenges are a viable alternative to intramuscular progesterone-in-oil for programmed frozen embryo transfer cycles.Fertil Steril. 2025 Jul;124(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.01.009. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Fertil Steril. 2025. PMID: 39848422
-
Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):CD006359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33112418 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mizrachi Y, Horowitz E, Farhi J, Raziel A, Weissman A. Ovarian stimulation for freeze-all IVF cycles: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26:119–36. - DOI
-
- Schmidt CL, de Ziegler D, Gagliardi CL, Mellon RW, Taney FH, Kuhar MJ, Colon JM, Weiss G. Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos: the natural cycle versus controlled preparation of the endometrium with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and exogenous estradiol and progesterone (GEEP). Fertil Steril. 1989;52:609–16. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mizrachi Y, Horowitz E, Herman HG, Farhi J, Raziel A, Weissman A. Should women receive luteal support following natural cycle frozen embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Repro Update. 2021;27:643–50. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
