Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 5;35(4):285-295.
doi: 10.1515/medgen-2023-2055. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Non-invasive prenatal testing: when results suggests maternal cancer

Affiliations

Non-invasive prenatal testing: when results suggests maternal cancer

Liesbeth Lenaerts et al. Med Genet. .

Abstract

It is now well-established that non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), originally designed to screen cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood for the presence of common fetal trisomies, can lead to incidental detection of occult maternal malignancies. Retrospective evaluations have demonstrated that the detection of multiple copy number alterations in cfDNA is particularly suggestive of an incipient tumor and that cancer detection rates not only depend on tumor biology but also on applied NIPT technologies and downstream diagnostic investigations. Since the identification of a maternal cancer in pregnancy has implications for both woman and the unborn child, prospective studies are needed to provide evidence on best clinical practices and on clinical utility in terms of patient outcomes.

Keywords: Cell-free DNA; incidental finding; maternal malignancy; non-invasive prenatal testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Detection of fetal-derived and tumor-derived copy number alterations via non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) during pregnancy. (A) Pregnant woman carrying a fetus with trisomy 21. During pregnancy, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments are released from the placenta (green cfDNA strands) into the maternal circulation and mixed with cfDNA from maternal origin (black cfDNA strands). Upon extraction of cfDNA fragments from maternal plasma, genome-wide sequencing of these fragments and subsequent bioinformatics analysis, the presence of a fetal trisomy 21 is visible as an overrepresentation of cfDNA fragments aligning to chromosome 21 (threshold of standard deviation > 3 (z-score) indicated as dotted red line). (B) Pregnant woman with an (occult) maternal malignancy and carrying a fetus with a normal karyotype. Cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) fragments (yellow ctDNA strands), that represent the genetic makeup of the malignancy including chromosomal aberrations, can be shed in the maternal bloodstream. Upon genome-wide NIPT assessment for the presence of chromosomal aneuploidies in the fetus, tumor-derived CNAs will skew the signals, giving rise to an aberrant NIPT result (elevated z-scores for chromosomes 1, 2, 7, 16 and 21 (chromosome numbers indicated in red on the x-axis); vice versa, in case of a (partial) monosomy, the chromosomal z-score would drop below < –3, not depicted here). When the observed aberrations are characteristic for tumor-derived chromosomal imbalances [22] and incompatible with fetal development, a maternal malignancy might be invoked.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Frequencies (%) of maternal malignancy types, inferred from NIPT. Numbers are retrieved from the large, population-based retrospective series on NIPT and detection of a maternal malignancy mentioned in Table 1.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Critical elements in a multidisciplinary management model for downstream clinical investigations in pregnant women confronted with a NIPT that is suggestive of an incipient tumor.
None
None
None
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dennis Lo Y. M. ‘Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum’. Lancet, vol. 350, no. 9076. Aug. 1997. pp. 485–487. et al. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02174-0. - PubMed
    1. Snyder M. W., Kircher M., Hill A. J., Daza R. M., Shendure J. ‘Cell-free DNA Comprises an in Vivo Nucleosome Footprint that Informs Its Tissues-Of-Origin’. Cell, vol. 164, no. 1–2. Jan. 2016. pp. 57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.050. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bianchi D. W., Chiu R. W. K. ‘Sequencing of Circulating Cell-free DNA during Pregnancy’. N Engl J Med, vol. 379, no. 5. Aug. 2018. pp. 464–473. doi: 10.1056/NEJMRA1705345. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brison N. ‘Accuracy and clinical value of maternal incidental findings during noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies’. Genet Med, vol. 19, no. 3. Mar. 2017. pp. 306–313. et al. doi: 10.1038/GIM.2016.113. - PubMed
    1. Stejskal P., Goodarzi H., Srovnal J., Hajdúch M., van ’t Veer L. J., Magbanua M. J. M. ‘Circulating tumor nucleic acids: biology, release mechanisms, and clinical relevance’. Molecular Cancer 2023 22:1, vol. 22, no. 1. Jan. 2023. pp. 1–21. doi: 10.1186/S12943-022-01710-W. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources