Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 31:15:513-525.
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S462588. eCollection 2024.

Practicing Peer Physical Examination by Medical and Allied Health Professions Students: Why the Hesitation and Where are We Now? A Narrative Literature Review

Noor Al-Chalabi  1
Affiliations
Review

Practicing Peer Physical Examination by Medical and Allied Health Professions Students: Why the Hesitation and Where are We Now? A Narrative Literature Review

Noor Al-Chalabi. Adv Med Educ Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: This narrative review aimed to examine the common existing factors that can influence medical students' attitudes and acceptability of peer physical examination, the presence of any variations of such attitudes over the time period included in the review, and provide measures to improve the acceptability of this practice, and directs attention to future research.

Methods: This study utilized a systematic and comprehensive search technique to find relevant publications based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. Electronic searches were conducted using two search engines, PubMed and Google Scholar, with an additional manual search on Medical Teacher Journal. In addition, a critical evaluation tool was applied to critically assess each article.

Results: Evidence indicated that gender is consistently reported as the most influential factor affecting the acceptance of peer physical examination among healthcare professionals, independent of the presence of other factors. Essentially, conservative cultures, religion, and particular ethnicities are still exerting their impacts on the participant's willingness to participate in this activity. In addition, the current study found no significant variations in accepting this practice by the students over the reviewed period of time.

Conclusion: According to the evidence provided by this review, a number of possible recommendations should be considered to boost and optimize the applicability of PPE. These include starting with non-sensitive areas, using single-gender pairing, and considering cultural and religious beliefs. Finally, there is a pressing need for future research, including multi-centric studies with larger and more diverse samples.

Keywords: acceptance; attitude; medical students; peer  physical examination; willingness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports no conflicts of interest for this research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the literature selection process according to PRISMA guidelines 2020.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Reid KJ, Kgakololo M, Sutherland RM, Elliott SL, Dodds AE. First-year medical students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(1):55–62. doi:10.1080/10401334.2012.641489 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manjunath H, Venkatesh D, Taklikar RH, Vijayanath V. Medical student’s perception and preferences about peer physical examination (PPE). Asian J Health Sci. 2014;2(1). doi:10.15419/AJHS.V2I1.423 - DOI
    1. Kahwage Neto SG, Braga TKK, Portella MB, Andriolo RB. The teaching of clinical skills and the applicability of a simplified guide for physical examination in the undergraduate medical program. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2017;41(4):457–467. doi:10.1590/1981-52712015v41n4RB20160110 - DOI
    1. Anderson RC, Fagan MJ, Sebastian J. Teaching students the art and science of physical diagnosis. Am J Med. 2001;110(5):419–423. doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00621-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muhrer JC. The importance of the history and physical in diagnosis. Nurse Practitioner. 2014;39(4):30–35. doi:10.1097/01.NPR.0000444648.20444.e6 - DOI - PubMed