Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 7;34(1):13-20.
doi: 10.1515/medgen-2022-2113. eCollection 2022 Apr.

From newborn screening to genomic medicine: challenges and suggestions on how to incorporate genomic newborn screening in public health programs

Affiliations

From newborn screening to genomic medicine: challenges and suggestions on how to incorporate genomic newborn screening in public health programs

Nicola Dikow et al. Med Genet. .

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) programs are considered among the most effective and efficient measures of secondary prevention in medicine. In individuals with medical conditions, genomic sequencing has become available in routine healthcare, and results from exome or genome sequencing may help to guide treatment decisions. Genomic sequencing in healthy or asymptomatic newborns (gNBS) is feasible and reveals clinically relevant disorders that are not detectable by biochemical analyses alone. However, the implementation of genomic sequencing in population-based screening programs comes with technological, clinical, ethical, and psychological issues, as well as economic and legal topics. Here, we address and discuss the most important questions to be considered when implementing gNBS, such as "which categories of results should be reported" or "which is the best time to return results". We also offer ideas on how to balance expected benefits against possible harms to children and their families.

Keywords: ELSA (ethical, legal, and social aspects); genomic medicine; genomic newborn screening; public health; return of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An approach to newborn screening and genomic medicine, considering different categories of results and the best time to return results to the families.

References

    1. Botkin JR. Ethical issues in pediatric genetic testing and screening. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28:700–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lüders A, Blankenstein O, Brockow I. et al. Neonatal Screening for congenital metabolic and endocrine disorders–results from Germany for the years 2006–2018. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118:101–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornel MC, Rigter T, Weinreich SS. et al. A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:12–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for diseases. Genève, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968.
    1. Howard HC, Knoppers BM, Cornel MC. et al. Whole-genome sequencing in newborn screening? A statement on the continued importance of targeted approaches in newborn screening programmes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:1593–600. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources