Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review
- PMID: 38836904
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04018-1
Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of patients with cancer, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and urothelial carcinoma. The extension of life expectancy has led to an increased incidence of bone metastases (BM) among patients with cancer. BM result in skeletal-related events, including severe pain, pathological fractures, and nerve palsy. Surgery is typically required for the treatment of BM in patients with an impending fracture; however, it may be avoided in those who respond to ICIs. We systematically reviewed studies analyzing BM responses to treatment with ICIs.
Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 statement and registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000053707). Studies reporting response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) criteria specific for BM in patients treated with ICIs were included; reports of fewer than five cases and review articles were excluded. Studies involving humans, published in English and Japanese, were searched. The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched. Ultimately, nine studies were analyzed. The Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to assess the quality of studies.
Results: Based on the MDA criteria, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was observed in 44-78% and 62% patients treated with ICIs plus denosumab for NSCLC and melanoma, respectively. According to the RECIST, CR or PR was recorded in 5% and 7-28% of patients treated with ICIs for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma, respectively.
Conclusion: Although response rates to ICIs for BM are poor, patients treated with ICI plus denosumab for bone metastases with impending fractures from NSCLC and melanoma are likely to avoid surgery to prevent fractures.
Keywords: Bone; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Metastasis; Response; Specific.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33270906 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Bisphosphonates for breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub3. PMID: 16034900 Updated.
-
Targeted therapy for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<I>ALK</I>)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 7;1(1):CD013453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013453.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 34994987 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive impact of sarcopenia in solid cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis.J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Oct;12(5):1122-1135. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12755. Epub 2021 Aug 1. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021. PMID: 34337889 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Impact of bone metastasis on prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 7;15:1493773. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1493773. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39575263 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Haslam A, Prasad V (2019) Estimation of the percentage of US patients with cancer who are eligible for and respond to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy drugs. JAMA Netw Open 2:e192535. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2535 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Joseph GJ, Johnson DB, Johnson RW (2023) Immune checkpoint inhibitors in bone metastasis: clinical challenges, toxicities, and mechanisms. J Bone Oncol 43:100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100505 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Schmid S, Diem S, Li Q et al (2018) Organ-specific response to nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer Immunol Immunother 67:1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-018-2239-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Qin A, Zhao S, Miah A et al (2021) Bone metastases, skeletal-related events, and survival in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19:915–921. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.7668 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- da Silva LM, da Silva GT, Bergmann A et al (2021) Impact of different patterns of metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Future Oncol 17:775–782. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-0587 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials