Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;25(7):163-168.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01208-6. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Unlocking Peer Review: Elevating Scholarly Writing and Research Competence in Urology Residency

Affiliations
Review

Unlocking Peer Review: Elevating Scholarly Writing and Research Competence in Urology Residency

Kate Dwyer et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose of review: It is incumbent upon training programs to set the foundation for evidence-based practices and to create opportunities for trainees to develop into academic leaders. As dedicated resident research time and funding have declined in recent years, residency programs and the field at large will need to create new ways to incorporate scholarly activity into residency curricula.

Recent findings: Literature across specialties demonstrates barriers to resident involvement including lack of time, cost, and absent scholarly mentorship. Peer review stands as a ready-made solution that can be formalized into a collaborative relationship with journals. A formal relationship between professional societies, academic journals, and residencies can facilitate the use of peer review as a teaching tool for residency programs.

Keywords: Medical education; Peer review; Resident education; Scholarship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
    1. Penrose LL, Yeomans ER, Praderio C, Prien SD. An incremental approach to improving scholarly activity. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(4):496–9. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00185.1 . PMID: 24294428; PMCID: PMC: 3546581.
    1. • Wood W, McCollum J, Kukreja P, et al. Graduate medical education scholarly activities initiatives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1407-8 . PMID: 3057777: PMCID: PMC6303993. This meta-analysis of 32 articles in General Medical Education demonstrates that the presence of an initiative to increase scholarly activity leads to significant increase in productivity. By combining approaches from many studies, the authors effectively catalog different strategies including mentors, curricular changes, and dedicated research time.
    1. • Faber LS, Jurado M, Bennett-Perez R, Alba FM. Scholarly activity and research training in urology residency programs: assessment of current practice and barriers. Urology. 2022;168:41–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.011 . Epub 2022 Jul 23. PMID: 35882304. The authors conducted a survey of United States urology residency programs, identifying which components of scholarly initiatives in this setting are most successful. Primary outcomes included resident participation in original research, presentations, and publications. They describe both promoting factors including protected time, attitudes and department support, and curricula as well as hindering factors such as lack of funding and experienced faculty.
    1. Garg N, Gottlieb M. Resident Research Tips: Surviving and Thriving Within the Peer Review Process. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(2):247–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.015 . Epub 2017 Oct 28 PMID: 29089170. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang G, Zaid UB, Erickson BA, Blaschko SD, Carroll PR, Breyer BN. Urology resident publication output and its relationship to future academic achievement. J Urol. 2011;185(2):642–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.097 . Epub 2010 Dec 18. PMID: 21168863; PMCID: PMC3565588. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources