Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jan;113(1):404-415.
doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00958-6. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions

Uzay Koç-Vural et al. Odontology. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

This 72-month study compared the clinical effectiveness of a resin-based composite (RBC) (Spectrum TPH3, Dentsply Sirona) with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Riva Light Cure, SDI) in restoring cervical caries lesions (CCLs). Thirty-three patients, each with at least two CCLs, were enrolled. After caries removal, the dimensions of the cavities were recorded. In a split-mouth study design, a total of 110 restorations were randomly placed. Fifty-five restorations were placed with RBC using an etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply Sirona), while the remaining 55 were restored with RMGIC. The restorations were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60, and 72 months according to modified USPHS criteria. Statistical analysis included Pearson Chi-square, Friedman tests, Kaplan Meier, and Logistic Regression analysis (p < 0.05). After 72 months, 47 restorations in 19 patients were evaluated (55% follow-up rate). Seventy-five percent of the RBC (n = 26) and 74% (n = 21) of the RMGIC restorations were fully retained. There were no significant differences between materials regarding retention and marginal adaptation (p > 0.05). Cavity dimensions, caries activity, and retention exhibited no correlation (p > 0.05). The increase in marginal staining in both groups over time was significant (p < 0.001). RMGIC restorations exhibited higher discoloration than RBC restorations (p = 0.014). At 72 months, three secondary caries lesions were detected in both restoration groups: two RMGIC and one RBC. There were no reports of sensitivity. After 72 months, both RBC and RMGIC restorations were clinically successful, with similar retention and marginal adaptation scores. However, it is noteworthy that RMGIC restorations tend to discoloration over time compared to RBC. The trial is registered in the database of "Clinical Trials". The registration number is NCT0372-2758, October 29, 2018.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000372.

Keywords: Cervical caries; Clinical trial; Composite resins; Glass ionomer cements; Root caries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. Ethics approval: This clinical study was performed in agreement with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 2013) and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Hacettepe University Ethical Committee for Clinical Investigations (approval number 2016/03–23 (KA-16003). Consent to participate: A written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish: Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their intraoral photographs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beard J, Officer A, Cassels A. Global health and aging In:World Health Organization: Geneva. 2015. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565042 . Accessed 5 Nov 2023.
    1. Ritter AV, Shugars DA, Bader JD. Root caries risk indicators: a systematic review of risk models. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38:383–97. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Hayes M, Da Mata C, Cole M, McKenna G, Burke F, Allen PF. Risk indicators associated with root caries in independently living older adults. J Dent. 2016;51:8–14. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Hoppenbrouwers PMM, Driessens FCM, Borggreven J. The mineral solubility of human tooth roots. Arch Oral Biol. 1987;32:319–22. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Featherstone JD. Fluoride, remineralization and root caries. Am J Dent. 1994;7:271–4. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data