Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions
- PMID: 38837034
- DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-00958-6
Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions
Abstract
This 72-month study compared the clinical effectiveness of a resin-based composite (RBC) (Spectrum TPH3, Dentsply Sirona) with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Riva Light Cure, SDI) in restoring cervical caries lesions (CCLs). Thirty-three patients, each with at least two CCLs, were enrolled. After caries removal, the dimensions of the cavities were recorded. In a split-mouth study design, a total of 110 restorations were randomly placed. Fifty-five restorations were placed with RBC using an etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply Sirona), while the remaining 55 were restored with RMGIC. The restorations were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60, and 72 months according to modified USPHS criteria. Statistical analysis included Pearson Chi-square, Friedman tests, Kaplan Meier, and Logistic Regression analysis (p < 0.05). After 72 months, 47 restorations in 19 patients were evaluated (55% follow-up rate). Seventy-five percent of the RBC (n = 26) and 74% (n = 21) of the RMGIC restorations were fully retained. There were no significant differences between materials regarding retention and marginal adaptation (p > 0.05). Cavity dimensions, caries activity, and retention exhibited no correlation (p > 0.05). The increase in marginal staining in both groups over time was significant (p < 0.001). RMGIC restorations exhibited higher discoloration than RBC restorations (p = 0.014). At 72 months, three secondary caries lesions were detected in both restoration groups: two RMGIC and one RBC. There were no reports of sensitivity. After 72 months, both RBC and RMGIC restorations were clinically successful, with similar retention and marginal adaptation scores. However, it is noteworthy that RMGIC restorations tend to discoloration over time compared to RBC. The trial is registered in the database of "Clinical Trials". The registration number is NCT0372-2758, October 29, 2018.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000372.
Keywords: Cervical caries; Clinical trial; Composite resins; Glass ionomer cements; Root caries.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. Ethics approval: This clinical study was performed in agreement with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 2013) and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Hacettepe University Ethical Committee for Clinical Investigations (approval number 2016/03–23 (KA-16003). Consent to participate: A written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish: Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their intraoral photographs.
Similar articles
-
Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.Odontology. 2021 Apr;109(2):376-384. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00550-8. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Odontology. 2021. PMID: 32902766 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial.Oper Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):581-592. doi: 10.2341/17-147-C. Epub 2018 May 21. Oper Dent. 2018. PMID: 29782222 Clinical Trial.
-
Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.Braz Dent J. 2010;21(3):229-34. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000300010. Braz Dent J. 2010. PMID: 21203706 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(5):391-403. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35008. J Adhes Dent. 2015. PMID: 26525003 Review.
-
The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104272. Epub 2022 Aug 28. J Dent. 2022. PMID: 36038075
Cited by
-
Performance of nitric acid and mineral enriched system versus phosphoric acid and universal adhesive in cervical carious lesions: a randomized clinical trial.BDJ Open. 2025 Sep 1;11(1):76. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00363-3. BDJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40890093 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of spacers and thermocycling on porosity and gaps in class II endodontic temporary restorations evaluated by microcomputed tomography.Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03458-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40481043 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beard J, Officer A, Cassels A. Global health and aging In:World Health Organization: Geneva. 2015. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565042 . Accessed 5 Nov 2023.
-
- Featherstone JD. Fluoride, remineralization and root caries. Am J Dent. 1994;7:271–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials