Pricing, Procurement and Reimbursement Policies for Incentivizing Market Entry of Novel Antibiotics and Diagnostics: Learnings from 10 Countries Globally
- PMID: 38837100
- DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00888-y
Pricing, Procurement and Reimbursement Policies for Incentivizing Market Entry of Novel Antibiotics and Diagnostics: Learnings from 10 Countries Globally
Abstract
Background: Fostering market entry of novel antibiotics and enhanced use of diagnostics to improve the quality of antibiotic prescribing are avenues to tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a major public health threat. Pricing, procurement and reimbursement policies may work as AMR 'pull incentives' to support these objectives. This paper studies pull incentives in pricing, procurement and reimbursement policies (e.g., additions to, modifications of, and exemptions from standard policies) for novel antibiotics, diagnostics and health products with a similar profile in 10 study countries. It also explores whether incentives for non-AMR health products could be transferred to AMR health products.
Methods: This research included a review of policies in 10 G20 countries based on literature and unpublished documents, and the production of country fact sheets that were validated by country experts. Initial research was conducted in 2020 and updated in 2023.
Results: Identified pull incentives in pricing policies include free pricing, higher prices at launch and price increases over time, managed-entry agreements, and waiving or reducing mandatory discounts. Incentives in procurement comprise value-based procurement, pooled procurement and models that delink prices from volumes (subscription-based schemes), whereas incentives in reimbursement include lower evidence requirements for inclusion in the reimbursement scheme, accelerated reimbursement processes, separate budgets that offer add-on funding, and adapted prescribing conditions.
Conclusions: While a few pull incentives have been piloted or implemented for antibiotics in recent years, these mechanisms have been mainly used to incentivize launch of certain non-AMR health products, such as orphan medicines. Given similarities in their product characteristics, transferability of some of these pull incentives appears to be possible; however, it would be essential to conduct impact assessments of these incentives. Trade-offs between incentives to foster market entry and thus potentially improve access and the financial sustainability for payers need to be addressed.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Payer Policies to Support Innovation and Access to Medicines in the WHO European Region [Internet].Copenhagen Ø, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2022. Copenhagen Ø, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2022. PMID: 36542740 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
How can the EU support sustainable innovation and access to effective antibiotics? Policy options for existing and new medicines [Internet].Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2023. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2023. PMID: 37582187 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):307-321. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 28063134 Review.
-
Ensuring access to medicines: How to redesign pricing, reimbursement and procurement? [Internet].Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2018. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2018. PMID: 30272895 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Interface policies bridging outpatient and hospital sectors in Europe: can cross-sectorial collaboration in reimbursement and procurement improve access to affordable medicines?Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(8):867-878. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2237683. Epub 2023 Jul 26. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023. PMID: 37450611
References
-
- Walsh TR, Gales AC, Laxminarayan R, Dodd PC. Antimicrobial resistance: addressing a global threat to humanity. San Francisco: Public Library of Science; 2023. p. e1004264.
-
- Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55.
-
- O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally. final report and recommendations. The review on antimicrobial resistance. London, 2016. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160525_Final%20paper_with%20c... . Accessed 1 Dec 2023.
-
- Smith R, Coast J. The economic burden of antimicrobial resistance: why it is more serious than current studies suggest. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM); 2012.
-
- Naylor NR, Atun R, Zhu N, Kulasabanathan K, Silva S, Chatterjee A, et al. Estimating the burden of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic literature review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:1–17.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical