Enhancing the Evaluation of Physical Function Following Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Comparison of PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment
- PMID: 38837210
- PMCID: PMC11146170
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002814
Enhancing the Evaluation of Physical Function Following Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Comparison of PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment
Abstract
Objectives: To compare measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (physical function [PF] and pain interference [PI]) computerized adaptive testing to traditional Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) (dysfunction index [DI] and bother index [BI]). To explore factors associated with PROMIS scores.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Level I Trauma Center.
Patient selection criteria: Isolated upper/lower extremity fracture patients were recruited from the orthopaedic trauma outpatient clinic (October 1, 2021 to January 1, 2023).
Outcome measures: Correlations (Pearson), reliability (standard error [SE] [T score]), efficiency (amount of information per item [1 - SE2/Nitems]), and floor/ceiling effects were assessed. An r > 0.7 represented high correlation, and SE ≤ 2.2 represented sufficient reliability. Factors associated with worse PROMIS scores were also identified.
Results: In total, 202 patients completed PROMs at median 98 days follow-up. Correlations between PROMIS-PF and SMFA-DI, and PROMIS-PI and SMFA-BI were -0.84 and 0.65. Reliability was very high for both instruments (mean SE 2.0 [PROMIS-PF], SE 2.1 [PROMIS-PI], and SE 1.2 [SMFA-DI], SE 1.8 [SMFA-BI]). Relative efficiency for PROMIS-PF versus SMFA-DI, and PROMIS-PI versus SMFA-BI was 7.8 (SD 2.5) and 4.1 (SD 1.7), respectively. Neither PROMIS nor SMFA exhibited floor/ceiling effects. In the multivariable regression analyses, elevated levels of depression, among other factors, showed an (independent) association with worse PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI scores.
Conclusions: PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI CATs showed a (high and moderate) correlation with SMFA and hence measure a comparable construct of physical function and discomfort. As computerized adaptive tests are much more efficient to administer, they present a compelling alternative to SMFA for evaluating impact of fracture treatment. The relation between symptoms of depression and PROMIS scores emphasizes the importance of psychosocial aspects of health in orthopaedic trauma patients.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Lieberman JR, Bozic KJ, Mallon WJ, et al. . It is all about value now: the data you need to collect and how to do it: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:e110. - PubMed
-
- Makhni EC, Hennekes ME, Baumhauer JF, et al. . AOA critical issues: patient-reported outcome measures: why every orthopaedic practice should be collecting them. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105:641–648. - PubMed
-
- Tatman LM, Obremskey WT. Patient reported outcomes: the foundation of value. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(suppl 7):S53–S55. - PubMed
-
- Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–2481. - PubMed
-
- Wei DH, Hawker GA, Jevsevar DS, et al. . Improving value in musculoskeletal care delivery: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:769–774. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
