The circadian syndrome is a predictor for cognition impairment in middle-aged adults: Comparison with the metabolic syndrome
- PMID: 38837323
- DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3827
The circadian syndrome is a predictor for cognition impairment in middle-aged adults: Comparison with the metabolic syndrome
Abstract
Aims: Circadian syndrome (CircS) is considered a better predictor for cardiovascular disease than the metabolic syndrome (MetS). We aim to examine the associations between CircS and MetS with cognition in Chinese adults.
Method: We used the data of 8546 Chinese adults aged ≥40 years from the 2011 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. MetS was defined using harmonised criteria. CircS included the components of MetS plus short sleep and depression. The cut-off for CircS was set as ≥4. Global cognitive function was assessed during the face-to-face interview.
Results: CircS and MetS had opposite associations with the global cognition score and self-reported poor memory. Compared with individuals without the CircS and MetS, the regression coefficients (95%CI) for global cognition score were -1.02 (-1.71 to -0.34) for CircS alone and 0.52 (0.09 to 0.96) for MetS alone in men; -1.36 (-2.00 to -0.72) for CircS alone and 0.60 (0.15 to 1.06) for MetS alone in women. Having CircS alone was 2.53 times more likely to report poor memory in men (95%CI 1.80-3.55) and 2.08 times more likely in women (95%CI 1.54-2.81). In contrast, having MetS alone was less likely to report poor memory (OR 0.64 (0.49-0.84) in men and 0.65 (0.52-0.81) in women). People with CircS and MetS combined were more likely to have self-reported poor memory.
Conclusions: CircS is a strong and better predictor for cognition impairment than MetS in Chinese middle-aged adults. MetS without short sleep and depression is associated with better cognition.
Keywords: Chinese; adults; circadian syndrome; cognition; memory; metabolic syndrome; sleep.
© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63‐75e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007
-
- Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413‐446. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(20)30367‐6
-
- Deng Y, Zhao S, Cheng G, et al. The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among Chinese people: a meta‐analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2021;55(2):79‐91. https://doi.org/10.1159/000512597
-
- Qi S, Yin P, Zhang H, et al. Prevalence of dementia in China in 2015: a nationwide community‐based study. Front Public Health. 2021;9:733314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.733314
-
- Singh‐Manoux A, Kivimaki M, Glymour MM, et al. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344(jan04 4):d7622. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7622
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical