Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun;1536(1):42-59.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.15141. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Pain perception as hierarchical Bayesian inference: A test case for the theory of constructed emotion

Affiliations
Review

Pain perception as hierarchical Bayesian inference: A test case for the theory of constructed emotion

Arnaud Poublan-Couzardot et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

An intriguing perspective about human emotion, the theory of constructed emotion considers emotions as generative models according to the Bayesian brain hypothesis. This theory brings fresh insight to existing findings, but its complexity renders it challenging to test experimentally. We argue that laboratory studies of pain could support the theory because although some may not consider pain to be a genuine emotion, the theory must at minimum be able to explain pain perception and its dysfunction in pathology. We review emerging evidence that bear on this question. We cover behavioral and neural laboratory findings, computational models, placebo hyperalgesia, and chronic pain. We conclude that there is substantial evidence for a predictive processing account of painful experience, paving the way for a better understanding of neuronal and computational mechanisms of other emotions.

Keywords: Bayesian brain hypothesis; Bayesian inference; emotion; pain; predictive processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Izard, C. E. (2010). The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2(4), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910374661
    1. Scherer, K. R. (2016). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216
    1. Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2019). Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion. Neuroscience Letters, 693, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.045
    1. Dukes, D., Abrams, K., Adolphs, R., Ahmed, M. E., Beatty, A., Berridge, K. C., Broomhall, S., Brosch, T., Campos, J. J., Clay, Z., Clément, F., Cunningham, W. A., Damasio, A., Damasio, H., D'arms, J., Davidson, J. W., De Gelder, B., Deonna, J., De Sousa, R., … Sander, D. (2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562‐021‐01130‐8
    1. Shackman, A. J., & Wager, T. D. (2019). The emotional brain: Fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Neuroscience Letters, 693, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.012

LinkOut - more resources