Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jun 5;14(6):e083637.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083637.

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Ki-67 in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Ki-67 in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yanyan Wang et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The relationship between Ki-67 expression and the prognosis of patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been extensively studied. However, their findings were inconsistent. Consequently, the present meta-analysis was performed to identify the precise value of Ki-67 in predicting the prognosis of ESCC.

Design: The current meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Data sources: Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until 26 September 2023.

Statistical methods: Pooled HRs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the role of Ki-67 in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in ESCC. Between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochrane's Q test and I2 statistics. Specifically, significant heterogeneities were identified based on p<0.10 on the Q statistic test or I2>50% so the random-effects model should be used; otherwise, the fixed-effects model should be used. The relationship between Ki-67 and clinicopathological characteristics of ESCC was evaluated by combining ORs with their corresponding 95% CIs.

Results: 11 articles with 1124 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Based on our analysis, increased Ki-67 expression was markedly associated with poor OS (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.28, p=0.006) and DFS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.43, p=0.002) in ESCC. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed that Ki-67 upregulation significantly predicted OS and DFS when a Ki-67 threshold of >30% was used. Nonetheless, Ki-67 was not significantly associated with sex, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, tumour differentiation or tumour location.

Conclusions: In the present meta-analysis, high Ki-67 expression significantly predicted OS and DFS in patients with ESCC, especially when Ki-67>30% was used as the threshold. These results suggest that Ki-67 could serve as an effective and reliable prognostic indicator for ESCC.

Keywords: Adult oncology; Adult pathology; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Gastrointestinal tumours; Meta-Analysis; Oesophageal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA flow chart of literature search and study selection. ESCC, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of associations between Ki-67 expression and OS of ESCC patients. ESCC, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of associations between Ki-67 expression and DFS of ESCC patients. DFS, disease-free survival; ESCC, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plots of the relationship between Ki-67 expression and clinicopathological features of ESCC patients. (A) Gender (male vs female); (B) Differentiation (well/moderate vs poor); (C) T stage (T3+T4 vs T1+T2); (D) N stage (N1 vs N0); (E) TNM stage (III+IV vs I+II); and (F) Location (lower+mid-thorax vs upper). ESCC, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sensitivity analysis. (A) OS and (B) DFS. DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 2021;71:209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2018;154:360–73. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, et al. . Oesophageal cancer. Lancet 2017;390:2383–96. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31462-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thrumurthy SG, Chaudry MA, Thrumurthy SSD, et al. . Oesophageal cancer: risks, prevention, and diagnosis. BMJ 2019;366:l4373. 10.1136/bmj.l4373 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. . Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:855–83. 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms