Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 5;14(1):12900.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61600-7.

Electrical lymph node scanning (ELS) system for real-time intra-operative detection of involved axillary lymph nodes in adjuvant breast cancer patients

Affiliations

Electrical lymph node scanning (ELS) system for real-time intra-operative detection of involved axillary lymph nodes in adjuvant breast cancer patients

Fereshteh Abbasvandi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Lymph node (LN) status is an essential prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients, with an important role in the surgical and therapeutic plan. Recently, we have been developed a novel system for real-time intra-operative electrical LN scanning in BC patients. The ELS scores were calibrated by pathological evaluation of the LNs. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of ELS in a prospective study for non-chemo-treated breast cancer patients. This is a prospective study in which ELS scores are blind for pathologists who declare the clearance or involvement of LNs based on permanent pathology as the gold standard. ELS and frozen-section (FS) pathology results were achieved intra-operatively, and samples were sent for the permanent pathology. The score of ELS did not affect the surgeons' decision, and the treatment approach was carried out based on FS pathology and pre-surgical data, such as imaging and probable biopsies. Patients were recruited from October 2021 through November 2022, and 381 lymph nodes of 97 patients were included in the study. In this study we recruited 38 patients (39.2%) with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 59 patients (60.8%) with ALND. Of the 381 LNs scored by ELS, 329 sentinel LNs underwent routine pathology, while others (n = 52) underwent both FS and permanent pathology. ELS showed a sensitivity of 91.4% for node-positive patients, decreasing to 84.8% when considering all LNs. Using ROC analysis, ELS diagnosis showed a significant AUC of 0.878 in relation to the permanent pathology gold standard. Comparison of ELS diagnosis for different tumor types and LN sizes demonstrated no significant differences, while increasing LN size correlated with enhanced ELS sensitivity. This study confirmed ELS's efficacy in real-time lymph node detection among non-chemo-treated breast cancer patients. The use of ELS's pathological scoring for intra-operative LN diagnosis, especially in the absence of FS pathology or for non-sentinel LN involvement, could improve prognosis and reduce complications by minimizing unnecessary dissection.

Keywords: Breast cancer surgery; Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); Impedance phase slope (IPS); Nodal staging; Pathology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic of ELS device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Classification criteria of ELS for non-chemo-treated patients discussed in. (b) IPS-Z1kHz diagram of ELS in 381 LNs of non-chemo-treated patients according to their pathological evaluations showing complete discrimination between free and involved LNs. (c) AUC and ROC for ELS in LNs detection. The reference line is belonged to the permanent pathology as the gold standard. (d) Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Positive, and Negative Predictive Values of ELS results by cancer types. (e) Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Positive, and Negative Predictive Values of ELS results by estimated LN size categories. (f) Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Positive, and Negative Predictive Values of ELS results by TNM (As sample size in N3 type is 3, the comparison was done between three other groups).

Similar articles

References

    1. Li N, Deng Y, Zhou L, Tian T, Yang S, Wu Y, et al. Global burden of breast cancer and attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2017: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019;12(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0828-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miripour ZS, Ghahremani A, Karimi K, Jahanbakhsh F, Abbasvandi F, Hoseinpour P, et al. Electrochemical therapy (EChT) of cancer tumor with an external anode, a way to achieve pathological complete response. Med. Oncol. 2023;40(4):117. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-01979-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdolahad M, Kaviani A. Real-time detection of cellular metabolism: A new trend for intra-operative diagnosis of cavity margins: Intraoperative CDP. Arch. Breast Cancer. 2023;10(1):1–3. doi: 10.32768/abc.20231011-3. - DOI
    1. Saadati F, Jahanbakhshi F, Mahdikia H, Abbasvandi F, Ghomi H, Yazdani N, et al. Cold physical plasma toxicity in breast and oral squamous carcinoma in vitro and in patient-derived cancer tissue ex vivo. Appl. Sci. 2023;13(11):6472. doi: 10.3390/app13116472. - DOI
    1. Dubsky P, Pinker K, Cardoso F, Montagna G, Ritter M, Denkert C, et al. Breast conservation and axillary management after primary systemic therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: The Lucerne toolbox. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(1):e18–e28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30580-5. - DOI - PubMed