Differential impacts of health systems and sociocultural environment on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from four Asia-Pacific countries
- PMID: 38840230
- PMCID: PMC11151645
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18949-1
Differential impacts of health systems and sociocultural environment on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from four Asia-Pacific countries
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate healthcare systems and pandemic responses in relation to marginalized and vulnerable groups, identify populations requiring urgent care, and assess the differential impacts on their health during the pandemic.
Methods: Data were collected by the Asia-Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (APO)-National University of Singapore and APO-International Health Policy Program consortium members: Korea, Indonesia, Philippines, and Singapore. Data were collected through a combination of semi-structured interviews, policy document reviews, and analysis of secondary data.
Results: Our findings reveal that the pandemic exacerbated existing health disparities, particularly affecting older adults, women, and children. Additionally, the study identified LGBTI individuals, healthcare workers, slum dwellers, and migrant workers as groups that faced particularly severe challenges during the pandemic. LGBTI individuals encountered heightened discrimination and limited access to health services tailored to their needs. Healthcare workers suffered from immense stress and risk due to prolonged exposure to the virus and critical working conditions. Slum dwellers struggled with healthcare access and social distancing due to high population density and inadequate sanitation. Migrant workers were particularly hard hit by high risks of virus transmission and stringent, often discriminatory, isolation measures that compounded their vulnerability. The study highlights the variation in the extent and nature of vulnerabilities, which were influenced by each country's specific social environment and healthcare infrastructure. It was observed that public health interventions often lacked the specificity required to effectively address the needs of all vulnerable groups, suggesting a gap in policy and implementation.
Conclusions: The study underscores that vulnerabilities vary greatly depending on the social environment and context of each country, affecting the degree and types of vulnerable groups. It is critical that measures to ensure universal health coverage and equal accessibility to healthcare are specifically designed to address the needs of the most vulnerable. Despite commonalities among groups across different societies, these interventions must be adapted to reflect the unique characteristics of each group within their specific social contexts to effectively mitigate the impact of health disparities.
Keywords: COVID-19; Health equity; Health policy; Vulnerable population.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Unequal ageing: the quality of life of senior citizens in the EU before and after COVID-19. A multidimensional approach.Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;13:1506006. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506006. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39944069 Free PMC article.
-
"We want our freedom back, that's our only need": a qualitative study of health and social needs among asylum seekers and undocumented migrants crossing the borders from Belarus to Lithuania.Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1371119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371119. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38756883 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 Wave Two Surveillance in East Asia and the Pacific: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 1;23(2):e25454. doi: 10.2196/25454. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33464207 Free PMC article.
-
The 2023 Latin America report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024. PMID: 38800647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Starfield's 4Cs of NCD management in primary healthcare: a conceptual framework development from a case study of 19 countries.BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jan 29;10(1):e017578. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017578. BMJ Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 39880416 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of Risk for Developing Severe Illness or Complications from COVID-19 in Brazil: Focus on Factors Linked to Socially Vulnerable Populations, 2020-2023.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 11;22(2):251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020251. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40003477 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in the Rates of Diagnoses of Mental and Behavioral Disorders Due to Psychoactive Substance Use by Sex and Age during Pre-Pandemic and COVID-19 Pandemic Periods in Kazakhstan.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 10;12(20):2012. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202012. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39451427 Free PMC article.
-
Reclaiming clinical time: The promise and challenges of ambient AI for oncology nurses in the Asia-Pacific region.Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jun 3;12:100737. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100737. eCollection 2025 Dec. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40678769 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Czymara CS, Langenkamp A, Cano T. Cause for concerns: gender inequality in experiencing the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. Eur Soc. 2021;23(sup1):S68–81. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1808692. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous