Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 31;13(3):266-274.
doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-aae-0042. Epub 2024 May 14.

Changes in aortic root dimensions post aortic root enlargement with Y-incision and modified aortotomy

Affiliations

Changes in aortic root dimensions post aortic root enlargement with Y-incision and modified aortotomy

William Truesdell et al. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Lifetime management in aortic stenosis (AS) can be facilitated by aortic root enlargement (ARE) to improve anatomy for future valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures. A mitral valve-sparing ARE technique ("Y-incision") and sinotubular junction (STJ) enlargement ("roof" patch aortotomy) allow upsizing by 3-4 valve sizes, but quantitative analysis of changes in root anatomy is lacking.

Methods: Among 78 patients who underwent ARE by Y-incision technique (± roof aortotomy closure) we identified 45 patients with high-quality pre- and post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans to allow analysis of change in aortic root dimensions. Detailed measurements of the annulus/basilar ring and sinuses were performed by an expert imager on both pre- and post-operative CTAs. The basal ring was defined as the functional annulus when a bioprosthetic valve was present.

Results: Average age was 65±11 years, the majority were female (29, 64%), and 9 (20%) had undergone prior aortic valve replacement (AVR). Valve upsizing was ≥3 sizes in 41 (91%). Post-operative mean basal ring diameter was larger compared to the native annular diameter (26.3 vs. 25.3 mm, P<0.01) and substantially larger than prior prosthetic valve in redo AVR (25.6 vs. 19.3 mm, P<0.001). Diameters of the sinuses at pre-operative computed tomography (CT) increased by +7.7±2.8 [right sinuses of Valsalva (R SVS)], +6.7±3.0 [left sinuses of Valsalva (L SVS)], and +6.6±2.9 mm [non-coronary sinuses of Valsalva (N SVS)]. Mean diameter of the STJ increased to 38.3±3.7 post-operative (+8.1±3.2 mm). Left main (LM) and right coronary artery (RCA) heights decreased by -6.3±3.3 and -3.7±3.4 mm respectively due to the supra-annular position of the valve, however, the post-operative valve-to-coronary (VTC) artery distances were 6.6±2.3 and 4.9±2.0 mm, respectively.

Conclusion: The Y-incision root enlargement technique significantly enlarges the sinus and STJ diameters by 6-7 mm while preserving VTC distances despite upsizing by 3-4 valve sizes, resulting in post-operative anatomy that is favorable for future transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV).

Keywords: Aortic root enlargement (ARE); Y-incision; aortic valve replacement (AVR); roof procedure; valve-in-valve (ViV).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detailed aortic root measurement schematic. Standard root measurements for transcatheter valve replacement planning were performed on pre-operative CT scans including annular sizes, sinus of Valsalva dimensions, heights of the sinuses and coronary ostia, and STJ size (A). On post-operative CT scans after bioAVR with upsizing and ARE, the pre-operative measurements were repeated, with the addition of measurements of the VTC and VTA distances (B). STJ, sinotubular junction; RCA, right coronary artery; LM, left main; CT, computed tomography; bioAVR, bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement; ARE, aortic root enlargement; VTC, valve-to-coronary; VTA, valve-to-aorta.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative example with 3D renderings of the aortic root from pre-operative (left) and post-operative (right) CT scans, demonstrating typical changes in the anatomy observed with Y-incision ARE, including significant enlargement of the sinus widths (+11 mm in this case) and STJ with upsizing by three valve sizes (implanted 29 mm Maga Ease). RCA, right coronary artery; LM, left main; 3D, three-dimensional; CT, computed tomography; ARE, aortic root enlargement; STJ, sinotubular junction.

References

    1. Jamieson WR, Ling H, Burr LH, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis evaluation over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S49-52. 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01127-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sá MPBO, Van den Eynde J, Simonato M, et al. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:211-20. 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dvir D, Leipsic J, Blanke P, et al. Coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: preprocedural evaluation, device selection, protection, and treatment. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002079. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002079 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ochiai T, Oakley L, Sekhon N, et al. Risk of Coronary Obstruction Due to Sinus Sequestration in Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:2617-27. 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ribeiro HB, Rodés-Cabau J, Blanke P, et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: insights from the VIVID registry. Eur Heart J 2018;39:687-95. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx455 - DOI - PubMed