Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 29:14:17.
doi: 10.25259/JCIS_27_2024. eCollection 2024.

Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature

Affiliations
Review

Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature

Jeffrey Otote et al. J Clin Imaging Sci. .

Abstract

Presacral/Retrorectal tumors (RRT) are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histological types. Data on surgical management are limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathological subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes. A PubMed search using terms "retrorectal tumor" and "presacral tumor" was used to identify articles reporting RRT of non-urological, non-gynecologic, and non-metastatic origin. Articles included were between 2015 and 2023. A total of 68 studies were included, comprising 570 patients. About 68.2% of patients were female, and the mean overall age of both sexes was 48.6 years. Based on histopathology, 466 patients (81.8%) had benign lesions, and 104 (18.2%) were malignant. In terms of surgical approach, 191 (33.5%) were treated anteriorly, 240 (42.1%) through a posterior approach, and 66 (11.6%) combined. The mean length of stay was 7.6 days. Patients treated using the posterior approach had a shorter length of stay (5.7 days) compared to the anterior and combined approaches. RRT are rare tumors of congenital nature with prevalence among the female sex. R0 resection is crucial in its management, and minimal access surgery appears to be a safer option in appropriate case selection.

Keywords: Combined abdominoperineal approach; Congenital cystic lesions; Perineal approach; Retrorectal tumors; Transabdominal approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.

References

    1. Hassan I, Wietfeldt ED. Presacral tumors: Diagnosis and management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009;22:84–93. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223839. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullard Dunn K. Retrorectal tumors. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:163–71. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hain KS, Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Menias CO, Bhalla S. Presacral masses: Multimodality imaging of a multidisciplinary space. Radiographics. 2013;33:1145–67. doi: 10.1148/rg.334115171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aubert M, Mege D. Kraske approach to retrorectal tumors: Surgical technique. J Visc Surg. 2022;159:229–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.01.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jao SW, Beart RW, Jr, Spencer RJ, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Retrorectal tumors. Mayo Clinic experience, 1960-1979. Dis Col Rectum. 1985;28:644–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02553440. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources