Optimizing Short Sprint Interval Training for Young Soccer Players: Unveiling Optimal Rest Distributions to Maximize Physiological Adaptations

Abstract

Present study aimed to compare the effects of SSIT intervention with varying rest distributions on hormonal, physiological, and performance adaptations in soccer players. Thirty-six players were randomly divided into three SSIT groups, each performing 4 sets of 6-10 repetitions of 6-second all-out running with rest intervals at ratios of 1:3, 1:6, and 1:9. Prior to and following the 7-week training period, aerobic fitness indices and anaerobic power were evaluated using a graded exercise test with a gas collection system and a lower-body Wingate test, respectively. Also, sport-specific bio-motor abilities were determined by measuring vertical jump, 20-m sprint, and T-test change of direction speed, Yo-Yo IR1 and maximal kicking distance. Hormonal status was also monitored by evaluating testosterone and cortisol levels. Following the 7-week training period, all SSIT interventions resulted in significant enhancements (p < 0.05) in soccer-related performance, physiological parameters, and hormonal adaptations, exhibiting effect sizes that ranged from small to large. Comparative analysis indicated that the 1:9 SSIT results in greater adaptive responses (p < 0.05) in the vertical jump, peak power, testosterone, and cortisol compared to the 1:3 SSIT group. By contrast, the 1:3 SSIT group induced more adaptive responses (p < 0.05) in the mean power output, maximum oxygen consumption (V̇O_2max), and Yo-Yo IR1 compared to the 1:9 SSIT group. Hence, for enhancing physical performance, especially vertical jump height, anaerobic peak power, and hormonal adaptations, the 1:9 SSIT ratio is preferable. Conversely, shorter rest intervals (specifically, the 1:3 SSIT ratio) are better suited for eliciting heightened adaptive responses in mean power output, V̇O_2max, and Yo-Yo IR1 over the 7-week training period among young male soccer players.

Keywords: Sprint interval training; aerobic capacity; metabolic conditioning; power.

Figure 1.

Study design.

Figure 2.

Changes in vertical jump, 20-m linear sprint and T-CODS following the 7-week SSIT (Mean ± SD). * indicates significant differences versus pre-value and CON (p < 0.05). **indicates significant differences compared with 1:3 SSIT (p < 0.05).

Figure 3.

Changes in aerobic capacity following the 7-week SSIT (Mean ± SD). * indicates significant differences versus pre-value and CON (p < 0.05). **indicates significant differences compared with 1:9 SSIT (p < 0.05).

Figure 4.

Changes in anaerobic peak and mean power output following the 7-week SSIT (Mean ± SD). * indicates significant differences versus pre-value and CON (p < 0.05). **indicates significant differences compared with 1:3 SSIT in peak power and with 1:9 SSIT in mean power (p < 0.05).

Figure 5.

Changes in MKDT following the 7-week training (Mean±SD). * indicates significant differences versus pre-value and CON (p < 0.05).

Figure 6.

Changes in testosterone and cortisol following the 7-week SSIT (Mean ± SD). * indicates significant differences versus pre-value and CON (p < 0.05). **indicates significant differences compared with 1:3 SSIT (p < 0.05).