Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 25:73:102652.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102652. eCollection 2024 Jul.

A multimodal aftercare intervention improves the outcome after kidney transplantation - results of the KTx360° aftercare program using claims data

Collaborators, Affiliations

A multimodal aftercare intervention improves the outcome after kidney transplantation - results of the KTx360° aftercare program using claims data

Lars Pape et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: The after-care treatment project KTx360° aimed to reduce graft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation (KTx).

Methods: The study was conducted in the study centers Hannover, Erlangen and Hannoversch Muenden from May 2017 to October 2020 under the trial registration ISRCTN29416382. The program provided a multimodal aftercare program including specialized case management, telemedicine support, psychological and exercise assessments, and interventions. For the analysis of graft failure, which was defined as death, re-transplantation or start of long-term dialysis, we used longitudinal claims data from participating statutory health insurances (SHI) which enabled us to compare participants with controls. To balance covariate distributions between these nonrandomized groups we used propensity score methodology, in particular the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.

Findings: In total, 930 adult participants were recruited at three different transplant centres in Germany, of whom 320 were incident (enrolled within the first year after KTx) and 610 prevalent (enrolled >1 year after KTx) patients. Due to differences in the availability of the claims data, the claims data of 411 participants and 418 controls could be used for the analyses. In the prevalent group we detected a significantly lower risk for graft failure in the study participants compared to the matched controls (HR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.04-0.39, p = 0.005, n = 389 observations), whereas this difference could not be detected in the incident group (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.54-1.56, p = 0.837, n = 440 observations).

Interpretation: Our findings suggest that a multimodal and multidisciplinary aftercare intervention can significantly improve outcome after KTx, specifically in patients later after KTx. For evaluation of effects on these outcome parameters in patients enrolled within the first year after transplantation longer observation times are necessary.

Funding: The study was funded by the Global Innovation fund of the Joint Federal Committee of the Federal Republic of Germany, grant number 01NVF16009.

Keywords: Adherence; Cardiovascular risk; Case-management; Graft survival; Kidney transplantation; Physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Observation periods using claims data relative to the timepoint of kidney transplantation (KTx) for incident participants and controls.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Observation periods using claims data relative to the timepoint of kidney transplantation (KTx) for prevalent participants and controls.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart of participants and controls for claims data analyses.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan Meier curves for graft failure in prevalent patients over the full observation period after kidney transplantation (KTx). The figure shows the Kaplan–Meier curves in prevalent patients for participants and controls for the full observation period after KTx. There is a clear difference in graft failure between the two groups, with fewer graft failures in participants compared to controls.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan Meier curves for graft failure in incident patients in the first two years after kidney transplantation (KTx). The figure shows the Kaplan–Meier curves in incident patients for participants and controls for the first two years after KTx. There is no difference in graft failure between the two groups.

References

    1. Wolfe R.A., Ashby V.B., Milford E.L., et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–1730. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hariharan S., Johnson C.P., Bresnahan B.A., Taranto S.E., McIntosh M.J., Stablein D. Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(9):605–612. MJBA-420901 [pii] - PubMed
    1. Kasiske B.L. Cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation. Semin Nephrol. 2000;20(2):176–187. - PubMed
    1. Hariharan S., Israni A.K., Danovitch G. Long-term survival after kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(8):729–743. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2014530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ying T., Shi B., Kelly P.J., Pilmore H., Clayton P.A., Chadban S.J. Death after kidney transplantation: an analysis by era and time post-transplant. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(12):2887–2899. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050566. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources