Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;38(10):775-788.
doi: 10.1007/s12149-024-01945-1. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

Deep generative denoising networks enhance quality and accuracy of gated cardiac PET data

Mojtaba Jafaritadi  1 , Jarmo Teuho  2   3 , Eero Lehtonen  2 , Riku Klén  2   3 , Antti Saraste  2   3   4 , Craig S Levin  5   6   7   8
Affiliations

Deep generative denoising networks enhance quality and accuracy of gated cardiac PET data

Mojtaba Jafaritadi et al. Ann Nucl Med. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) can visualize and quantify the molecular and physiological pathways of cardiac function. However, cardiac and respiratory motion can introduce blurring that reduces PET image quality and quantitative accuracy. Dual cardiac- and respiratory-gated PET reconstruction can mitigate motion artifacts but increases noise as only a subset of data are used for each time frame of the cardiac cycle.

Aim: The objective of this study is to create a zero-shot image denoising framework using a conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) for improving image quality and quantitative accuracy in non-gated and dual-gated cardiac PET images.

Methods: Our study included retrospective list-mode data from 40 patients who underwent an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) cardiac PET study. We initially trained and evaluated a 3D cGAN-known as Pix2Pix-on simulated non-gated low-count PET data paired with corresponding full-count target data, and then deployed the model on an unseen test set acquired on the same PET/CT system including both non-gated and dual-gated PET data.

Results: Quantitative analysis demonstrated that the 3D Pix2Pix network architecture achieved significantly (p value<0.05) enhanced image quality and accuracy in both non-gated and gated cardiac PET images. At 5%, 10%, and 15% preserved count statistics, the model increased peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) by 33.7%, 21.2%, and 15.5%, structural similarity index (SSIM) by 7.1%, 3.3%, and 2.2%, and reduced mean absolute error (MAE) by 61.4%, 54.3%, and 49.7%, respectively. When tested on dual-gated PET data, the model consistently reduced noise, irrespective of cardiac/respiratory motion phases, while maintaining image resolution and accuracy. Significant improvements were observed across all gates, including a 34.7% increase in PSNR, a 7.8% improvement in SSIM, and a 60.3% reduction in MAE.

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that dual-gated cardiac PET images, which often have post-reconstruction artifacts potentially affecting diagnostic performance, can be effectively improved using a generative pre-trained denoising network.

Keywords: 18F-FDG PET; Cardiac PET; Cardiac gating; Conditional GAN; Deep learning; Dual-gated PET; Respiratory gating.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schindler TH, Schelbert HR, Quercioli A, Dilsizian V. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):623–40. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loghin C, Sdringola S, Gould KL. Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(6):1029–39. - PubMed
    1. Burrell S, MacDonald A. Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34(4):193–211. - PubMed
    1. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, Squire OD, et al. Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer by respiratory correlated dynamic PET: methodology and comparison with respiratory gated PET. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(10):1644–8. - PubMed
    1. Livieratos L, Rajappan K, Stegger L, Schafers K, Bailey DL, Camici PG. Respiratory gating of cardiac PET data in list-mode acquisition. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:584–8. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources