Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;27(4):703-717.
doi: 10.1007/s10456-024-09930-y. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

Lactate secreted by glycolytic conjunctival melanoma cells attracts and polarizes macrophages to drive angiogenesis in zebrafish xenografts

Affiliations

Lactate secreted by glycolytic conjunctival melanoma cells attracts and polarizes macrophages to drive angiogenesis in zebrafish xenografts

Jie Yin et al. Angiogenesis. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Conjunctival melanoma (CoM) is a rare but potentially lethal cancer of the eye, with limited therapeutic option for metastases. A better understanding how primary CoM disseminate to form metastases is urgently needed in order to develop novel therapies. Previous studies indicated that primary CoM tumors express Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and may recruit pro-tumorigenic M2-like macrophages. However, due to a lack of proper models, the expected role of angiogenesis in the metastatic dissemination of CoM is still unknown. We show that cells derived from two CoM cell lines induce a strong angiogenic response when xenografted in zebrafish larvae. CoM cells are highly glycolytic and secrete lactate, which recruits and polarizes human and zebrafish macrophages towards a M2-like phenotype. These macrophages elevate the levels of proangiogenic factors such as VEGF, TGF-β, and IL-10 in the tumor microenvironment to induce an angiogenic response towards the engrafted CoM cells in vivo. Chemical ablation of zebrafish macrophages or inhibition of glycolysis in CoM cells terminates this response, suggesting that attraction of lactate-dependent macrophages into engrafted CoM cells drives angiogenesis and serves as a possible dissemination mechanism for glycolytic CoM cells.

Keywords: Angiogenesis; Conjunctival melanoma; Glycolysis; Lactate; Macrophages; Zebrafish model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Informed consent statement All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiments Committee (Dier Experimenten Commissie, D.E.C.) under licenses AVD1060020172410 and AVD10600202216495. All animals were maintained in accordance with local guidelines using standard protocols: www.ZFIN.org (accessed on 12 Dec 2019). Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Metastatic conjunctival melanoma cells induce angiogenesis and recruitment of macrophages in a zebrafish angiogenesis model. a Schematic representation of the angiogenesis assay in zebrafish xenografts. Cancer cells or 2% PVP used as vehicle are injected into the PVS at 2 day post fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larvae Tg(kdrl:EGFPs843; mpeg1:GAL4-VP16gl24; UAS-E1b: NfsB-mCherryi149). In response to a strong angiogenic signal, the SIV complex is deformed towards the injection focus. b Representative images of time-lapses recording the angiogenic response to the SIV from 2 to 24 hpi. c Quantifications of the angiogenic activity induced by engraftment of CoM cells at 24hpi as measured by the angle, total length, and elongation of the SIV complex
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Chemical ablation of macrophages inhibits tumor-induced angiogenesis in a zebrafish model. a Representative images of xenografted zebrafish larvae, treated with or without 2.5mM MTZ at 24hpi. b Quantification of the angiogenic capacity of cancer cells with and without macrophages. c Xenografted zebrafish material was retrieved and used to detect angiogenetic and inflammatory factors with qPCR. d Expression levels of zebrafish VEGF-A (vegfaa), TGF-β (tgfb1a), and IL-10 (il10) in CRMM1 and CRMM2 engrafted groups. e Expression of the M2 marker IL-4 (il4) in tumor engrafted zebrafish treated with DMSO and MTZ. f Expression of proinflammatory markers, iNOS (nos2a), IL-1β (il1b), and TNF-α (tnfa) in DMSO or MTZ-treated groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Lactate and glycolytic 4T1 cells attract zebrafish macrophages. a Schematic diagram of injection of lactate and hCCL2 into the zebrafish hindbrain. b Quantification of the macrophages attracted to the hindbrain under different conditions. c Representative images of the angiogenic effect in the SIV complex with and without treatment with MTZ at 24 hpi. d Quantification of the angiogenic influence of the 67NR and 4T1 cell lines with and without macrophages. e Expression of the zebrafish-derived proangiogenic markers VEGF-A (vegfaa), TGF-β (tgfb1a), and IL-10 (il10)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CoM cells secrete lactate and maintain their glycolytic properties in xenograft models. a Schematic representation of the glycolysis pathway with key enzymes in the process, showing the effect of 2DG inhibiting the activity of Hexokinase 1 (HK1). b Quantification of cell viability during treatment of increasing 2DG concentrations for 24 h. c The cellular ATP level of 67NR and 4T1, CRMM1, and CRMM2 after 2DG treatment. d 2DG inhibited the lactate production in 67NR and 4T1, CRMM1, and CRMM2 cells. e Expression of the glycolysis-related enzymes HK1, PFK1, PDK, and LDHA in zebrafish 4T1, 67NR, CRMM1 and CRMM2 xenografts
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Supernatant secreted by CoM cells polarizes macrophages to an M2-like phenotype leading to higher expression of proangiogenic factors. a Schematic diagram of the conditioned medium experimental design. b Expression of CD86, CD206, VEGF-A, and TGF-β of macrophages in conditioned medium models
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Inhibition of glycolysis attenuates macrophage-dependent angiogenesis of CoM cells. a Schematic diagram of 2DG treatment in cancer cells prior to their xenografting in zebrafish larvae. b Representative images of the angiogenesis response of embryos xenografted with CoM lines treated with and without 2DG treatment. c Quantification of the angiogenesis response in these conditions. d Quantification of the pro-angiogenic factors VEGF-A (vegfaa) and TGF-β (tgfb1a) in engrafted zebrafish

References

    1. Shields CL, Shields JA, Gündüz K, Cater J, Mercado GV, Gross N et al (2000) Conjunctival melanoma: risk factors for recurrence, exenteration, metastasis, and death in 150 consecutive patients. Arch Ophthalmol 118(11):1497–1507. 10.1001/archopht.118.11.1497 - PubMed
    1. Brouwer NJ, Verdijk RM, Heegaard S, Marinkovic M, Esmaeli B, Jager MJ (2022) Conjunctival melanoma: new insights in tumour genetics and immunology, leading to new therapeutic options. Prog Retin Eye Res 86:100971. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100971 - PubMed
    1. Shields CL, Markowitz JS, Belinsky I, Schwartzstein H, George NS, Lally SE et al (2011) Conjunctival melanoma: outcomes based on tumor origin in 382 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 118(2):389–395 e382. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.021 - PubMed
    1. Virgili G, Parravano M, Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Mazzini C, Mallone S et al (2020) Incidence and survival of patients with conjunctival melanoma in Europe. JAMA Ophthalmol 138(6):601–608. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0531 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grimes JM, Shah NV, Samie FH, Carvajal RD, Marr BP (2020) Conjunctival melanoma: current treatments and future options. Am J Clin Dermatol 21:371–381. 10.1007/s40257-019-00500-3 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources