Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jul;8(7):482-490.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00104-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study

Julie C Leonard et al. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Jul.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Cervical spine injuries in children are uncommon but potentially devastating; however, indiscriminate neck imaging after trauma unnecessarily exposes children to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a paediatric clinical prediction rule that can be incorporated into an algorithm to guide radiographic screening for cervical spine injury among children in the emergency department.

Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we screened children aged 0-17 years presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma at 18 specialised children's emergency departments in hospitals in the USA affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Injured children were eligible for enrolment into derivation or validation cohorts by fulfilling one of the following criteria: transported from the scene of injury to the emergency department by emergency medical services; evaluated by a trauma team; and undergone neck imaging for concern for cervical spine injury either at or before arriving at the PECARN-affiliated emergency department. Children presenting with solely penetrating trauma were excluded. Before viewing an enrolled child's neck imaging results, the attending emergency department clinician completed a clinical examination and prospectively documented cervical spine injury risk factors in an electronic questionnaire. Cervical spine injuries were determined by imaging reports and telephone follow-up with guardians within 21-28 days of the emergency room encounter, and cervical spine injury was confirmed by a paediatric neurosurgeon. Factors associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury (>10%) were identified by bivariable Poisson regression with robust error estimates, and factors associated with non-negligible risk were identified by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Variables were combined in the cervical spine injury prediction rule. The primary outcome of interest was cervical spine injury within 28 days of initial trauma warranting inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Rule performance measures were calculated for both derivation and validation cohorts. A clinical care algorithm for determining which risk factors warrant radiographic screening for cervical spine injury after blunt trauma was applied to the study population to estimate the potential effect on reducing CT and x-ray use in the paediatric emergency department. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05049330.

Findings: Nine emergency departments participated in the derivation cohort, and nine participated in the validation cohort. In total, 22 430 children presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma were enrolled (11 857 children in the derivation cohort; 10 573 in the validation cohort). 433 (1·9%) of the total population had confirmed cervical spine injuries. The following factors were associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury: altered mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 3-8 or unresponsive on the Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive scale [AVPU] of consciousness); abnormal airway, breathing, or circulation findings; and focal neurological deficits including paresthesia, numbness, or weakness. Of 928 in the derivation cohort presenting with at least one of these risk factors, 118 (12·7%) had cervical spine injury (risk ratio 8·9 [95% CI 7·1-11·2]). The following factors were associated with non-negligible risk of cervical spine injury by CART analysis: neck pain; altered mental status (GCS score of 9-14; verbal or pain on the AVPU; or other signs of altered mental status); substantial head injury; substantial torso injury; and midline neck tenderness. The high-risk and CART-derived factors combined and applied to the validation cohort performed with 94·3% (95% CI 90·7-97·9) sensitivity, 60·4% (59·4-61·3) specificity, and 99·9% (99·8-100·0) negative predictive value. Had the algorithm been applied to all participants to guide the use of imaging, we estimated the number of children having CT might have decreased from 3856 (17·2%) to 1549 (6·9%) of 22 430 children without increasing the number of children getting plain x-rays.

Interpretation: Incorporated into a clinical algorithm, the cervical spine injury prediction rule showed strong potential for aiding clinicians in determining which children arriving in the emergency department after blunt trauma should undergo radiographic neck imaging for potential cervical spine injury. Implementation of the clinical algorithm could decrease use of unnecessary radiographic testing in the emergency department and eliminate high-risk radiation exposure. Future work should validate the prediction rule and care algorithm in more general settings such as community emergency departments.

Funding: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services in the Maternal and Child Health Bureau under the Emergency Medical Services for Children programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cervical spine injury classification and regression tree
1Altered Mental Status defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9– 14; Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive (AVPU) scale of V or P; or other signs of altered mental status. 2Substantial injuries defined as those that warrant inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Data are n/N (%). The participants analyzed to derive the classification tree were those within the derivation cohort who did not meet any of the high-risk findings (GCS of 3 – 8; AVPU of U; observed abnormal airway, breathing, or circulation findings; or observed focal neurologic deficits on examination). Numerators in each of the nodes represent cervical spine injury.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Clinical algorithm for cervical spine imaging in children after blunt trauma predicated on the PECARN Cervical Spine Injury Prediction Rule.
AVPU, Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive; CSI, cervical spine injury; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; PECARN, Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network; CART, Classification And Regression Tree Analysis. 1High risk factors determined using unadjusted logistic regression. 2Altered Mental Status defined as GCS score of 9– 14; Alert, AVPU scale of V or P; or other signs of altered mental status. 3 Substantial injuries defined as those that warrant inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Clinical algorithm to determine which children warrant imaging to screen for potential CSI after blunt trauma. The risk of CSI was calculated using the emergency department case report forms for the combined derivation and validation cohorts. High-risk factors were used to determine those warranting computed tomography, and CART risk factors were used to determine those warranting plain radiographs. Data are n/N (%).

References

    1. Leonard JR, Jaffe DM, Kuppermann N, Olsen CS, Leonard JC. Cervical spine injury patterns in children. Pediatrics 2014; 133(5): e1179–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD, Shah MN, Mower WR, Hoffman JR. A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics 2001; 108(2): E20. - PubMed
    1. Platzer P, Jaindl M, Thalhammer G, et al. Cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients. J Trauma 2007; 62(2): 389–96; discussion 94–6. - PubMed
    1. Mannix R, Nigrovic LE, Schutzman SA, et al. Factors associated with the use of cervical spine computed tomography imaging in pediatric trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18(9): 905–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol 2007; 14(4): 227–32. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data