Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;27(11):1605-1619.
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.018. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

Measuring Healthcare Experiences Among People With Intellectual Disability: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis of Tools and Methods

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Measuring Healthcare Experiences Among People With Intellectual Disability: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis of Tools and Methods

Reema Harrison et al. Value Health. 2024 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) collect essential data for service and system-wide quality improvement and performance monitoring toward value-based care. However, the experiences of people with intellectual disability, who have high healthcare utilization couple with poorer outcomes, are often omitted from system-wide PREMs and service-wide PREMs data. The use of PREMs instruments for data collection among people with intellectual disability has not been explored. This review aimed to identify and synthesize measurement tools and approaches that have been used to gather patient-reported experience data from people with intellectual disability.

Methods: Rapid evidence assessment was used, in which comprehensive search strategies were applied to electronic databases and gray literature. Narrative synthesis was used with the included articles to address the review aim.

Results: A total of 48 documents were included; 26 peer-reviewed journal articles and 22 articles from gray literature. Patient-reported experiences have been gathered from people with intellectual disabilities in relation to specific services or encounters, predominantly using qualitative methods. To date, there is an absence of targeted service- or system-wide surveys. Existing clinic- and condition-specific instruments provide insight for broader application.

Conclusions: Patient experience assessment among people with intellectual disability requires consideration of (1) how individuals are identified and approached, (2) the content, design and structure of measurement instruments, and (3) the process by which data are collected, and (4) how it may be applied to create change. Despite the collection of patient experience data from people with intellectual disability, there is little research available about how this information is later used to support health service improvement. Applying PREMs for quality improvement is critical to realize the improvements to healthcare provision required for people with intellectual disability toward equitable care quality.

Keywords: equity; intellectual disability; patient experience; patient-reported measures; surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section.

References

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources