Interactions between biocrusts and herbaceous communities are divergent in dry and wet semiarid ecosystems
- PMID: 38844240
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173759
Interactions between biocrusts and herbaceous communities are divergent in dry and wet semiarid ecosystems
Abstract
Biocrusts are a prevalent form of living cover in worldwide drylands, and their presence are intimately associated with herbaceous community, forming a spatially mosaic distribution pattern in dryland ecosystems. The role of biocrusts as modulators of herbaceous community assembly is extensively studied, whereas, less is known whether their interactions are permanent or changeable with various environmental conditions. This study conducted a field survey of herbaceous community accompanied by three types of biocrusts (cyanobacterial, cyanobacterial-moss mixed, and moss crusts) in two contrasting (dry and wet) semiarid climate regions in the Chinese Loess Plateau, to explore whether or not climatic aridity gradient affects the interactions between biocrusts and herbaceous community. Our results showed that in dry semiarid climate, the biomass, species richness, and diversity of herbaceous community from biocrust plots were 89 %, 179 %, and 52 % higher than that from the uncrusted plots, respectively, while in wet semiarid climate, those herbaceous community indices from biocrust plots were 68 %, 43 %, and 23 % lower than that from the uncrusted plots, respectively. The impacts of biocrusts on herbaceous community were highly dependent on the types and coverage of biocrusts. Regardless of aridity gradient, the richness and diversity of herbaceous community were the lowest in the moss-covered plots, followed by the cyanobacteria-covered plots and the plots with a mixed cyanobacteria and moss population. Along with increasing biocrust coverage, the species richness and diversity of herbaceous plants initially increased and then decreased in dry semiarid climate, while in wet semiarid climate they decreased linearly with biocrust coverage. Structural equation modeling revealed that the factors of biocrust types and coverage affected herbaceous community indirectly through soil properties in dry semiarid climate, whereas in wet semiarid climate they directly affected herbaceous community through biotic interactions. Together, our findings indicated that cyanobacterial and moss biocrusts facilitate the development of herbaceous community in dry semiarid climate by increasing soil stability and nutrient levels, but in wet semiarid climate they restrict herbaceous plant growth through competing niche space. These results highlight the divergent relationships between biocrusts and herbaceous community across aridity gradient in dryland ecosystems, and this knowledge may be critically important in light of the projected global climate change which is going to change the aridity of global drylands.
Keywords: Aridity gradient; Biodiversity; Biological soil crusts; Biomass; Dryland ecosystem; Herbaceous community; Species richness.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Cyanobacterial and moss biocrusts shape soil nematode community in dryland mountain ecosystems with increasing aridity.Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 25;931:172750. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172750. Epub 2024 Apr 26. Sci Total Environ. 2024. PMID: 38677426
-
Biocrusts enhance soil organic carbon stability and regulate the fate of new-input carbon in semiarid desert ecosystems.Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 25;918:170794. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170794. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Sci Total Environ. 2024. PMID: 38336052
-
Mapping biocrust distribution in China's drylands under changing climate.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:167211. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167211. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 37730025
-
Data variability or paradigm shift? Slow versus fast recovery of biological soil crusts-a review.Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 15;721:137683. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137683. Epub 2020 Mar 7. Sci Total Environ. 2020. PMID: 32197290 Review.
-
What is a biocrust? A refined, contemporary definition for a broadening research community.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Oct;97(5):1768-1785. doi: 10.1111/brv.12862. Epub 2022 May 18. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022. PMID: 35584903 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Interactive effects of Orobanche latisquama parasitism and drought stress in Salvia rosmarinus plants growing under Mediterranean field conditions.Physiol Plant. 2024 Nov-Dec;176(6):e14652. doi: 10.1111/ppl.14652. Physiol Plant. 2024. PMID: 39641143 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources