Nonoperative management of acute complicated diverticulitis with pericolic and/or distant extraluminal air: A systematic review
- PMID: 38844410
- DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12244
Nonoperative management of acute complicated diverticulitis with pericolic and/or distant extraluminal air: A systematic review
Abstract
Introduction: Colonic Diverticular Disease (CDD) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease. Acute diverticulitis (AD), with extraluminal free air (both pericolic and distant), represents about 15% of radiological scenarios and remains a therapeutic challenge for surgeons. Currently, the WSES guidelines suggest trying a conservative strategy both in the presence of pericolic and distant free extraluminal air, even if both have respectively weak recommendation based on low/very low-quality evidence.
Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were used to identify articles of interest.
Results: A total of 2380 patients with AD and extraluminal free air (both pericolic and distant) who underwent nonoperative management (NOM) were analyzed. Of the 2380 patients, 2095(88%) were successfully treated with NOM, while 285 (12%) patients failed. A total of 1574 (93.1%) patients with pericolic extraluminal free air had a successful NOM with 6.9% (117) failure rates, while 135 (71.1%) patients with distant extraluminal free air had a successful NOM with 28.9% (55) failure rates. Regarding distant recurrence, we recorded a rate of 18.3% (261/1430), while a rate of 11.3% (167/1472) was recorded for patients undergoing elective surgery.
Conclusion: NOM for patients with AD and extraluminal free air (both pericolic and distant) seems to be feasible and safe despite a higher failure rate in the distant subgroup, which remains the most challenging clinical scenario to deal with through conservative treatment.
Keywords: acute diverticulitis; extaluminal air; non‐operative management.
© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
References
REFERENCES
-
- Strate, L. L., and A. M. Morris. 2019. “Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Diverticulitis.” Gastroenterology 156(5): 1282–1298.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.033.
-
- Wheat, C. L., and L. L. Strate. 2016. “Trends in Hospitalization for Diverticulitis and Diverticular Bleeding in the United States from 2000 to 2010.” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 14(1): 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.030.
-
- Yamamichi, N., T. Shimamoto, Y. Takahashi, Y. Sakaguchi, H. Kakimoto, R. Matsuda, Y. Kataoka, et al. 2015. “Trend and Risk Factors of Diverticulosis in Japan: Age, and Lifestyle/metabolic‐Related Factors May Cooperatively Affect on the Colorectal Diverticula Formation.” PLoS One 10(4): e0123688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123688.
-
- Painter, N. S., and D. P. Burkitt. 1975. “Diverticular Disease of the Colon, a 20th Century Problem.” Clinics in Gastroenterology 4(1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300‐5089(21)00094‐8.
-
- Parks, T. G. 1975. “Natural History of Diverticular Disease of the Colon.” Clinics in Gastroenterology 4(1): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300‐5089(21)00097‐3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources