Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;38(6):1237-1247.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01181-y. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

Predicting short-term outcomes in brain-injured patients: a comprehensive approach with transcranial Doppler and intracranial compliance assessment

Affiliations

Predicting short-term outcomes in brain-injured patients: a comprehensive approach with transcranial Doppler and intracranial compliance assessment

Sérgio Brasil et al. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Neurocritical patients frequently exhibit abnormalities in cerebral hemodynamics (CH) and/or intracranial compliance (ICC), all of which significantly impact their clinical outcomes. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and the cranial micro-deformation sensor (B4C) are valuable techniques for assessing CH and ICC, respectively. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding the predictive value of these techniques in determining patient outcomes. We prospectively included neurocritical patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring within the first 5 days of hospital admission for TCD and B4C assessments. Comprehensive clinical data were collected alongside parameters obtained from TCD (including the estimated ICP [eICP] and estimated cerebral perfusion pressure [eCPP]) and B4C (measured as the P2/P1 ratio). These parameters were evaluated individually as well as in combination. The short-term outcomes (STO) of interest were the therapy intensity levels (TIL) for ICP management recommended by the Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference, as TIL 0 (STO 1), TIL 1-3 (STO 2) and death (STO 3), at the seventh day after last data collection. The dataset was randomly separated in test and training samples, area under the curve (AUC) was used to represent the noninvasive techniques ability on the STO prediction and association with ICP. A total of 98 patients were included, with 67% having experienced severe traumatic brain injury and 15% subarachnoid hemorrhage, whilst the remaining patients had ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. ICP, P2/P1, and eCPP demonstrated the highest ability to predict early mortality (p = 0.02, p = 0.02, and p = 0.006, respectively). P2/P1 was the only parameter significant for the prediction of STO 1 (p = 0.03). Combining B4C and TCD parameters, the highest AUC was 0.85 to predict death (STO 3), using P2/P1 + eCPP, whereas AUC was 0.72 to identify ICP > 20 mmHg using P2/P1 + eICP. The combined noninvasive neuromonitoring approach using eCPP and P2/P1 ratio demonstrated improved performance in predicting outcomes during the early phase after acute brain injury. The correlation with intracranial hypertension was moderate, by means of eICP and P2/P1 ratio. These results support the need for interpretation of this information in the ICU and warrant further investigations for the definition of therapy strategies using ancillary tests.

Keywords: Acute brain injury; Cerebral hemodynamics; Intracranial compliance; Intracranial pressure; Transcranial Doppler; Traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical statement: The manuscript complies with all instructions to authors. Authorship requirements have been met and the final manuscript was approved by all authors giving consent for its publication. This manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. The authors confirm adherence to ethical guidelines and approvals (IRB/CAAE: 66721217.0.0000.0068 by the University of São Paulo School of Medicine Ethics Committee). Checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) was applied (supplemental). The present manuscript has a previous version posted online before peer review (preprint), available at https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3406169/v1 . Competing interests: Sérgio Brasil and Danilo Cardim have recently joined brain4care’s scientific committee. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic drawing of data collection setting. Intracranial pressure (ICP), B4C sensor and transcranial Doppler (TCD) data registered concomitantly
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Most significant variables associated with short-term outcomes. eCPP and P2/P1 were significantly different between survivors and non survivors. eCPP: estimated cerebral perfusion pressure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Linear correlations with intracranial pressure (ICP) for the parameters assessed. CBFV: cerebrovascular velocities, eCPP: estimated cerebral perfusion pressure, eICP: estimated ICP, P2/P1: quotient between second and first ICP peaks, PI: pulsatility index

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lahiri S, Mayer SA, Fink ME, et al. Mechanical ventilation for acute stroke: a multi-state population-based study. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(1):28–32. - PubMed
    1. Chesnut R, Aguilera S, Buki A, et al. A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle international severe traumatic brain injury consensus conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):919–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin NA, Patwardhan RV, Alexander MJ, et al. Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(1):9–19. - PubMed
    1. Lazaridis C. Brain shock-toward pathophysiologic phenotyping in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Explor. 2022;4(7):e0724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mataczynski C, Kazimierska A, Uryga A. Intracranial pressure pulse morphology-based definition of life-threatening intracranial hypertension episodes. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022;2022:1742–6. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources