Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Aug;43(8):2551-2563.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06991-8. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

Durable control of psoriatic arthritis with guselkumab across domains and patient characteristics: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Durable control of psoriatic arthritis with guselkumab across domains and patient characteristics: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study

Christopher T Ritchlin et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate patterns of stringent disease control with 2 years of guselkumab across key disease-identified domains and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) defined by baseline characteristics.

Method: This post hoc analysis of DISCOVER-2 (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03158285) evaluated biologic-naïve PsA patients (≥ 5 swollen/ ≥ 5 tender joints, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 0.6 mg/dL) randomized to guselkumab every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab at Weeks 0 and 4, then Q8W; or placebo with crossover to guselkumab Q4W at Week 24. Achievement of American College of Rheumatology 50/70% improvement (ACR50/70), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0, dactylitis/enthesitis resolution, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue response (≥ 4-point improvement), HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) response (≥ 0.35-point improvement), PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) low disease activity (LDA), and minimal disease activity (MDA) was assessed at Weeks 24, 52, and 100 in subgroups defined by sex and baseline medication use, body mass index, PsA duration, swollen/tender joints, CRP, and psoriasis severity/extent. Patients with missing categorical response data were considered nonresponders.

Results: 442/493 (90%) guselkumab-randomized patients completed treatment through Week 100. Significant multi-domain efficacy of guselkumab versus placebo was shown across adequately sized patient subgroups. A pattern of continuous improvement was observed across key PsA domains and PROs within patient subgroups: 65%-85% of guselkumab-randomized patients had enthesitis/dactylitis resolution, 50%-70% achieved complete skin clearance, 60%-80% reported meaningful improvements in function/fatigue, 40%-65% achieved PASDAS LDA, and 35%-50% achieved MDA at Week 100.

Conclusion: Patients with active PsA receiving guselkumab demonstrated durable achievement of stringent endpoints associated with disease control across key PsA domains and PROs, regardless of baseline characteristics. Key Points • Among biologic-naïve patients with highly active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), efficacy of guselkumab across stringent disease endpoints and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at Week 24 was consistent regardless of baseline demographics and disease characteristics. • Within guselkumab-randomized PsA patient subgroups, major improvements in joint disease activity, complete skin clearance, dactylitis/enthesitis resolution, clinically meaningful improvements in PROs, and achievement of low overall disease activity were maintained through Week 100. • Durable stringent endpoint achievement indicating disease control was observed with guselkumab, regardless of baseline patient or disease characteristics.

Keywords: Disease control; Domain; Guselkumab; Patient-reported outcome; Psoriatic arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CTR: Received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, UCB and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. PJM: Received research grants from AbbVie, Acelyrin, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, Acelyrin, Aclaris, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Immagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, UCB, and Ventyx; speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. WHB: Received honoraria as a speaker and advisor from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, and UCB. JT: Has served on advisory boards/as a consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Samumed/ Biosplice, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB; served on speaker bureaus for: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Bristol Myers Squibb (through 2021), Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi/Genzyme; received research grants and support from: AbbVie, Alpine, Amgen, Anthrosi, Bendcare, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas, CSL Behring, DRL, Eli Lilly, Emerald, Exagen, Genentech, Gilead, Global Health Living Foundation, Horizon, Janssen, Kolon TissueGene, Mitsubishi, Organogenesis, Pfizer, Samumed/Biosplice, Selecta, Setpoint, Sun, Takeda, and Vorso. SDC: Employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. ER: Employee of JSS Medical Research; paid consultant of Janssen. MS: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson. ES: Received consulting fees and research grants from Janssen JFM: Received consulting fees and investigator honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun, and UCB. Current affiliation: Department of Dermatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. IBM: Received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cabaletta, Compugen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB; grant/research support from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and UCB; is a shareholder for Causeway, and Evelo Compugen; NHS GGC Board Member; Evelo Board of Directors; and Versus Arthritis Trustee. AD: Received consulting fees for participation in advisory boards from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; research grant funding from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportions of guselkumab-randomized patients achieving ACR50 and ACR70 response through Week 100 by baseline characteristics. Proportions displayed for subgroups indicate the response rates (utilizing NRI) at Week 100. ACR50: ≥ 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria; ACR70: ≥ 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria; BMI: body mass index; BSA: body surface area; CRP: C-reactive protein; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GUS: guselkumab; MTX: methotrexate; NRI: nonresponder imputation; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; Q4W: every 4 weeks; Q8W: every 8 weeks; W: Week
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportions of guselkumab-randomized patients achieving PASI 100 and IGA 0 through Week 100 by baseline characteristics. Achievement of PASI 100 and IGA 0 was assessed among patients with BSA ≥ 3% and IGA ≥ 2 at baseline. Proportions displayed for subgroups indicate the response rates (utilizing NRI) at Week 100. BMI: body mass index; BSA: body surface area; CRP: C-reactive protein; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GUS: guselkumab; IGA: Investigator’s Global Assessment; MTX: methotrexate; NRI: nonresponder imputation; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 100: 100% improvement in PASI; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; Q4W: every 4 weeks; Q8W: every 8 weeks; W: Week
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of guselkumab-randomized patients achieving resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis through Week 100 by baseline characteristics. Resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis was assessed among patients with dactylitis and enthesitis at baseline, respectively. Proportions displayed for subgroups indicate the response rates (utilizing NRI) at Week 100. BMI: body mass index; BSA: body surface area; CRP: C-reactive protein; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GUS: guselkumab; MTX: methotrexate; NRI: nonresponder imputation; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; Q4W: every 4 weeks; Q8W: every 8 weeks; W: Week
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportion of guselkumab-randomized patients achieving HAQ-DI and FACIT-Fatigue response through Week 100 by baseline characteristics. Achievement of HAQ-DI response (improvement ≥ 0.35) FACIT-Fatigue response (improvement ≥ 4) was assessed among patients with baseline HAQ-DI ≥ 0.35 and baseline FACIT-Fatigue ≤ 48, respectively. Proportions displayed for subgroups indicate the response rates (utilizing NRI) at Week 100. BMI: body mass index; BSA: body surface area; CRP: C-reactive protein; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; FACIT: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; GUS: guselkumab; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; MTX: methotrexate; NRI: nonresponder imputation; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; Q4W: every 4 weeks; Q8W: every 8 weeks; W: Week
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Proportion of guselkumab-randomized patients achieving PASDAS LDA and MDA through Week 100 by baseline characteristics. Proportions displayed for subgroups indicate the response rates (utilizing NRI) at Week 100. BMI: body mass index; BSA: body surface area; CRP: C-reactive protein; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GUS: guselkumab; LDA: low disease activity; MDA: minimal disease activity; MTX: methotrexate; NRI: nonresponder imputation; PASDAS: Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; Q4W: every 4 weeks; Q8W: every 8 weeks; W: Week

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS (2010) Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 69:48–53. 10.1136/ard.2008.102053 10.1136/ard.2008.102053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coates LC, Soriano ER, Corp N et al (2022) Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021. Nat Rev Rheum 18:465–479. 10.1038/s41584-022-00798-0 10.1038/s41584-022-00798-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A et al (2019) Special article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 71:5–32. 10.1002/art.40726 10.1002/art.40726 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vieira-Sousa E, Eusebio M, Avila-Ribeiro P et al (2020) Real-world longterm effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis patients from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register. J Rheumatol 47:690–700. 10.3899/jrheum.181272 10.3899/jrheum.181272 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linde L, Ornbjerg LM, Georgiadis S et al (2023) Predictors of DAPSA28 remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis initiating a first TNF-inhibitor: results from 13 European registries. Rheumatology (Oxford) 63:751–764. 10.1093/rheumatology/kead284 10.1093/rheumatology/kead284 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data