Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug;30(8):2343-2348.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03069-5. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of early detection and bundled treatment of postpartum hemorrhage alongside the E-MOTIVE trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A cost-effectiveness analysis of early detection and bundled treatment of postpartum hemorrhage alongside the E-MOTIVE trial

Eleanor V Williams et al. Nat Med. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Timely detection and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) are crucial to prevent complications or death. A calibrated blood-collection drape can help provide objective, accurate and early diagnosis of PPH, and a treatment bundle can address delays or inconsistencies in the use of effective interventions. Here we conducted an economic evaluation alongside the E-MOTIVE trial, an international, parallel cluster-randomized trial with a baseline control phase involving 210,132 women undergoing vaginal delivery across 78 secondary-level hospitals in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Tanzania. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the E-MOTIVE intervention, which included a calibrated blood-collection drape for early detection of PPH and a bundle of first-response treatments (uterine massage, oxytocic drugs, tranexamic acid, intravenous fluids, examination and escalation), compared with usual care. We used multilevel modeling to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of the public healthcare system for outcomes of cost per severe PPH (blood loss ≥1,000 ml) avoided and cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Our findings suggest that the use of a calibrated blood-collection drape for early detection of PPH and bundled first-response treatment is cost-effective and should be perceived by decision-makers as a worthwhile use of healthcare budgets. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04341662 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.J.H. has consulted for Equalize Health, a not-for-profit health technology company. This did not influence the design, conduct or reporting of the research presented in this manuscript. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Summary of the E-MOTIVE intervention.
The E-MOTIVE intervention included a calibrated blood-collection drape for early detection of PPH and a bundle of first-response treatments (uterine massage, oxytocic drugs, TXA, IV fluids, examination and escalation), supported by an implementation strategy.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Randomization of hospitals in the E-MOTIVE trial.
All participating hospitals entered a 7-month baseline period in which they provided usual care for patients having vaginal delivery. After the baseline phase, hospitals were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the E-MOTIVE intervention or to continue providing usual care. Eighty hospitals across Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Tanzania underwent randomization. Due to participating in a conflicting program, two hospitals in Tanzania did not receive the assigned intervention. Data for analysis were therefore available from 78 hospitals, with a total of 210,132 patients. Source-verified blood loss data for analysis were available for 206,455 patients.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicating the probability of the E-MOTIVE intervention being cost-effective across different WTP thresholds for a DALY averted.
The dashed lines show the expected WTP for a DALY averted, as estimated from WHO recommendations (green) and Woods and colleagues (blue).
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Costing assumptions.
Costing assumptions used for economic evaluation.

References

    1. Kassebaum, N. J. et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet384, 980–1004 (2014). 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60696-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheldon, W. R. et al. Postpartum haemorrhage management, risks, and maternal outcomes: findings from the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG121, 5–13 (2014). 10.1111/1471-0528.12636 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Say, L. et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health2, e323–e333 (2014). 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theunissen, F. et al. Cost of hospital care of women with postpartum haemorrhage in India, Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda: a financial case for improved prevention. Reprod. Health18, 18 (2021). 10.1186/s12978-020-01063-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kes, A. et al. The economic burden of maternal mortality on households: evidence from three sub-counties in rural western Kenya. Reprod. Health12, S3 (2015). 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S1-S3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources