Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):272.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03075-w.

Association between PM2.5 from a coal mine fire and FeNO concentration 7.5 years later

Affiliations

Association between PM2.5 from a coal mine fire and FeNO concentration 7.5 years later

Sara Kress et al. BMC Pulm Med. .

Abstract

Background and aim: There are few long-term studies of respiratory health effects of landscape fires, despite increasing frequency and intensity due to climate change. We investigated the association between exposure to coal mine fire PM2.5 and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration 7.5 years later.

Methods: Adult residents of Morwell, who were exposed to the 2014 Hazelwood mine fire over 6 weeks, and unexposed residents of Sale, participated in the Hazelwood Health Study Respiratory Stream in 2021, including measurements of FeNO concentration, a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Individual exposure to coal mine fire PM2.5 was modelled and mapped to time-location diaries. The effect of exposure to PM2.5 on log-transformed FeNO in exhaled breath was investigated using multivariate linear regression models in the entire sample and stratified by potentially vulnerable subgroups.

Results: A total of 326 adults (mean age: 57 years) had FeNO measured. The median FeNO level (interquartile range [IQR]) was 17.5 [15.0] ppb, and individual daily exposure to coal mine fire PM2.5 was 7.2 [13.8] µg/m3. We did not identify evidence of association between coal mine fire PM2.5 exposure and FeNO in the general adult sample, nor in various potentially vulnerable subgroups. The point estimates were consistently close to zero in the total sample and subgroups.

Conclusion: Despite previous short-term impacts on FeNO and respiratory health outcomes in the medium term, we found no evidence that PM2.5 from the Hazelwood coal mine fire was associated with any long-term impact on eosinophilic airway inflammation measured by FeNO levels.

Keywords: Air pollution; Coal industry; Landscape fires; Particulate matter; Respiratory; Smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MJA holds investigator initiated grants for unrelated research from Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi and GSK. He has also undertaken an unrelated consultancy for Sanofi and received a speaker’s fee from GSK. BRT is on the medical advisory board of Chiesi and NDD. He has also undertaken unrelated consultancy for GSK. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage change in FeNO levels per 10 µg/m3 increase in mine fire PM2.5 after 7.5 years. FeNO = Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (year: 2021) PM2.5 = particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 µm (year: 2014). Main model (entire sample) adjusted for potential confounders selected a priori including town (Morwell vs. Sale), sex, age, BMI, smoking, education, employment, occupational exposure, and any inhaled corticosteroid including combination inhalers. CI = confidence intervals. Preparation for FeNO assessment: excluding individuals who did not follow the preparation for FeNO assessment. Elderly: individuals ≥ 65 years. Obese: individual BMI ≥ 30 kg/m.2. Smoking: current and former smokers. Socially disadvantaged: individuals with secondary education up to year 10 or unemployed/unable to work. Respiratory symptoms: individuals with chronic cough, chest tightness or nasal allergy in 2017. Atopic conditions: individuals with chest tightness, nasal allergy or self-reported doctor-diagnosed asthma. Respiratory diseases: individuals with doctor-diagnosed asthma or COPD (spirometry z-score < lower limit of normal)

Similar articles

References

    1. Xu R, Yu P, Abramson MJ, Johnston FH, Samet JM, Bell ML, et al. Wildfires, global climate change, and human health. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2173–2181. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2028985. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Dwyer T, Abramson MJ, Straney L, Salimi F, Johnston F, Wheeler AJ, et al. Sub-clinical effects of outdoor smoke in affected communities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:1131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031131. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A review. Front Public Health. 2020;8:14. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor S, Borg B, Gao C, Brown D, Hoy R, Makar A, et al. The impact of the Hazelwood coal mine fire smoke exposure on asthma. J Asthma. 2022;59:213–222. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1847931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schraufnagel DE. The health effects of ultrafine particles. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:311–317. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0403-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources