Bone Marrow Sparing by Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy in Postoperative Irradiation of Gynecologic Malignancies
- PMID: 38845139
- PMCID: PMC11159539
- DOI: 10.1177/15330338241252622
Bone Marrow Sparing by Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy in Postoperative Irradiation of Gynecologic Malignancies
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this matched-pair cohort study was to evaluate the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for sparring of the pelvic bone marrow and thus reduction of hematotoxicity compared to intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) in the setting of postoperative irradiation of gynaecological malignancies. Secondary endpoint was the assessment of predictive parameters for the occurrence of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) when applying IMPT. Materials and Methods: Two cohorts were analyzed consisting of 25 patients each. Patients were treated with IMPT compared with IMRT and had uterine cervical (n = 8) or endometrial cancer (n = 17). Dose prescription, patient age, and diagnosis were matched. Dosimetric parameters delivered to the whole pelvic skeleton and subsites (ilium, lumbosacral, sacral, and lower pelvis) and hematological toxicity were evaluated. MRI follow-up for evaluation of SIF was only available for the IMPT group. Results: In the IMPT group, integral dose to the pelvic skeleton was significantly lower (23.4GyRBE vs 34.3Gy; p < 0.001), the average V5Gy, V10Gy, and V20Gy were reduced by 40%, 41%, and 28%, respectively, compared to the IMRT group (p < 0.001). In particular, for subsites ilium and lower pelvis, the low dose volume was significantly lower. Hematotoxicity was significantly more common in the IMRT group (80% vs 32%; p = 0009), especially hematotoxicity ≥ CTCAE II (36% vs 8%; p = 0.037). No patient in the IMPT group experienced hematotoxicity > CTCAE II. In the IMPT cohort, 32% of patients experienced SIF. Overall SIF occurred more frequently with a total dose of 50.4 GyRBE (37.5%) compared to 45 GyRBE (22%). No significant predictive dose parameters regarding SIF could be detected aside from a trend regarding V50Gy to the lumbosacral subsite. Conclusion: Low-dose exposure to the pelvic skeleton and thus hematotoxicity can be significantly reduced by using IMPT compared to a matched photon cohort. Sacral insufficiency fracture rates appear similar to reported rates for IMRT in the literature.
Keywords: cervical cancer; chemoradiotherapy; hematotoxicity; insufficiency fracture; proton therapy; radiatio dosimetry; toxicity; uterine cancer; uterine cervical cancer; volumetric modulated.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JHR reports honoraria from ViewRay Inc. and Pfizer Inc. as well as research grants from IntraOP Medical and Varian Medical Systems. LK reports grants from Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Accuray Inc., and Novocure GmbH outside the submitted work. KH reports grants for trial support from Roche Pharma, German Cancer Aid outside the submitted work, support for attending meetings and/or travel from the German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) and leadership/fiduciary role in the Radiation Oncology working group of the GLA. JD received grants or has contracts with Viewray Inc, CRI – The Clinical Research Institute GmbH, Accuray International Sari, RaySearch Laboratories AB, Vision RT Limited, Merck Serono GmbH, Astellas Pharma GmbH, Astra Zeneca GmbH, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Solution Akademie GmbH, Ergomed PLC Surrey Research Park, Quintiles GmbH, Pharmaceutical Research Associates GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & CoKG, PTW-Freiburg Dr Pychlau GmbH, Nanobiotix S.A. and Accuray Incorporated outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients.Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17916. doi: 10.1002/mp.17916. Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40660888 Free PMC article.
-
Intensity-modulated proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy using a fixed-beam system for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric comparison with x-ray radiotherapy and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation.Phys Med Biol. 2024 Jan 2;69(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad13d1. Phys Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38064747
-
The application of multi-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy and fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of gynecologic cancer with large planning target volume.Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Jun;48(2):715-721. doi: 10.1007/s13246-025-01538-w. Epub 2025 Apr 22. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 40261579
-
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(47):1-108, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14470. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 21029717
-
Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 23;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-197. Radiat Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23176540 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Dosimetric Advantage of Scanning Beam Proton Therapy in Gynecologic Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;17(12):2010. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122010. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40563662 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling the effects of radiation on the bone tumor microenvironment: opportunities for exploring combination therapies in microphysiologic systems.Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025 Aug 14;30(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s11658-025-00774-y. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025. PMID: 40813975 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ellis RE. The distribution of active bone marrow in the adult. Phys Med Biol. 1961;5(3):255–258. - PubMed
-
- Mauch P, Constine L, Greenberger J, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1319–1339. - PubMed
-
- Mell LK, Kochanski JD, Roeske JC, et al. Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(5):1356–1365. - PubMed
-
- Rose BS, Liang Y, Lau SK, et al. Correlation between radiation dose to (1)(8)F-FDG-PET defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(4):1185–1191. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources