Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug;296(2):187-199.
doi: 10.1111/joim.13810. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

Colonoscopy findings after increasing two-stool faecal immunochemical test (FIT) cut-off: Cross-sectional analysis of the SCREESCO randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Colonoscopy findings after increasing two-stool faecal immunochemical test (FIT) cut-off: Cross-sectional analysis of the SCREESCO randomized trial

Marcus Westerberg et al. J Intern Med. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: We determined the impact of an increased two-stool faecal immunochemical test (FIT) cut-off on colonoscopy positivity and relative sensitivity and specificity in the randomized controlled screening trial screening of Swedish colons conducted in Sweden.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of participants in the FIT arm that performed FIT between March 2014 and 2020 within the study registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02078804, who had a faecal haemoglobin concentration of at least 10 µg/g in at least one of two stool samples and who underwent a colonoscopy (n = 3841). For each increase in cut-off, we computed the positive predictive value (PPV), numbers needed to scope (NNS), sensitivity and specificity for finding colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasia (AN; advanced adenoma or CRC) relative to cut-off 10 µg/g.

Results: The PPV for AN increased from 23.0% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 22.3%-23.6%) at cut-off 10 µg/g to 28.8% (95% CI: 27.8%-29.7%) and 33.1% (95% CI: 31.9%-34.4%) at cut-offs 20 and 40 µg/g, respectively, whereas the NNS to find a CRC correspondingly decreased from 41 to 27 and 19. The PPV for AN was higher in men than women at each cut-off, for example 31.5% (95% CI: 30.1%-32.8%) in men and 25.6% (95% CI: 24.3%-27.0%) in women at 20 µg/g. The relative sensitivity and relative specificity were similar in men and women at each cut-off.

Conclusion: A low cut-off of around 20-40 µg/g allows detection and removal of many AN compared to 10 µg/g while reducing the number of colonoscopies in both men and women.

Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; faecal immunochemical test; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

References

    1. Njor SH, Andersen B, Friis‐Hansen L, de Haas N, Linnemann D, Nørgaard H, et al. The optimal cut‐off value in fit‐based colorectal cancer screening: an observational study. Cancer Med. 2021;10:1872–1879.
    1. van der Meulen MP, Lansdorp‐Vogelaar I, van Heijningen EM, Kuipers EJ, van Ballegooijen M. Nonbleeding adenomas: evidence of systematic false‐negative fecal immunochemical test results and their implications for screening effectiveness‐a modeling study. Cancer. 2016;122:1680–1688.
    1. Berry E, Miller S, Koch M, Balasubramanian B, Argenbright K, Gupta S. Lower abnormal fecal immunochemical test cut‐off values improve detection of colorectal cancer in system‐level screens. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:647–653.
    1. Breekveldt EC, Toes‐Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, Spaander MCW, Dekker E, van Kemenade FJ, et al. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed‐methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f‐Hb concentration in a fit‐based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT‐FIT). BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23:1–10.
    1. Brenner H, Werner S. Selecting a cut‐off for colorectal cancer screening with a fecal immunochemical test. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8:e111.

Publication types

Associated data