Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli
- PMID: 3884523
- DOI: 10.3109/00207458508985369
Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli
Abstract
The present paper reviews a series of studies regarding the effects of hemispheric asymmetry and reading and writing habits on directional preferences in reproducing horizontally-displayed visual stimuli. Hebrew readers, English readers, and Arabic readers were presented with arrays of horizontally-displayed directional and nondirectional stimuli, as well as with single stimuli. They were asked to reproduce the stimuli, and the direction of their reproduction, left-right or right-left, was recorded for analysis. Generally, in reproducing arrays of stimuli, English readers showed left-right directionality, whereas Hebrew readers showed right-left directionality. But in reproducing arrays of English and Hebrew letters, subjects of both groups showed left-right and right-left preferences, respectively. However, the right-left directional preferences shown by Hebrew readers were weaker than the left-right preferences shown by English readers. It was hypothesized that these differences are due to differential reading and writing habits acquired in school by English- and Hebrew-readers. In support of the reading and writing habit hypothesis, it was subsequently found that: (a) Arabic readers, who have stronger right-left reading and writing habits than Hebrew readers, show relatively stronger right-left directional preferences, and (b) with the introduction of English as a foreign language in the fifth grade, children show an increase in left-right directionality. Further investigation showed that, depending on the experimental conditions, directional preferences may be a function of either reading and writing habits, or hemispheric asymmetry, or both. Finally, the bearing of these findings on the "nature-nurture" controversy regarding the development of perceptual exploration in children is discussed.
Similar articles
-
Directional tendencies of Hebrew, Japanese, and English readers.Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Aug;93(1):178-80. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.93.1.178. Percept Mot Skills. 2001. PMID: 11693683
-
Directional preferences of bilingual children.Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Jun;56(3):747-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.3.747. Percept Mot Skills. 1983. PMID: 6877962
-
Directional scanning effect and strength of reading habit in picture naming and recall.Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):484-90. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12030493
-
A review of directionality trends in the horizontal dimension as a function of innate and environmental factors.J Gen Psychol. 1977 Jan;96(1st Half):125-34. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1977.9920806. J Gen Psychol. 1977. PMID: 320287 Review.
-
Visuo-spatial discrimination and mirror image letter reversals in reading.J Am Optom Assoc. 1992 Oct;63(10):698-704. J Am Optom Assoc. 1992. PMID: 1430744 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual Benefits in Apparent Motion Displays: Automatically Driven Spatial and Temporal Anticipation Are Partially Dissociated.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 1;10(12):e0144082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144082. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26623650 Free PMC article.
-
Reading direction causes spatial biases in mental model construction in language understanding.Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 15;5:18248. doi: 10.1038/srep18248. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 26667996 Free PMC article.
-
Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Sep;68:669-693. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.032. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016. PMID: 27350096 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The SNARC Effect in Number Memorization and Retrieval. What is the Impact of Congruency, Magnitude and the Exact Position of Numbers in Short-Term Memory Processing?Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016 Dec 31;12(4):193-208. doi: 10.5709/acp-0198-0. eCollection 2016. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016. PMID: 28154615 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Language on Spatial Reasoning: Reading Habits Modulate the Formulation of Conclusions and the Integration of Premises.Front Psychol. 2021 May 17;12:654266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654266. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34079496 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources