Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 28:12:310.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.128797.2. eCollection 2023.

How an international research funder's forum developed guiding principles to ensure value and reduce waste in research

Matthew Westmore  1 , Michael Bowdery  2 , Anne Cody  3 , Kelly Dunham  4 , Dorota Goble  5 , Barbara van der Linden  6 , Evelyn Whitlock  4 , Elaine Williams  5 , Cristina Lujan Barroso  7
Affiliations

How an international research funder's forum developed guiding principles to ensure value and reduce waste in research

Matthew Westmore et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Background: When health-related research funding agencies choose to fund research, they balance a number of competing issues: costs, stakeholder views and potential benefits. The REWARD Alliance, and the related Lancet-REWARD Campaign, question whether those decisions are yielding all the value they could. Methods: A group of health-related research funding agencies, organisations that represent health-related research funding agencies and those that inform and set health-related-research funding policy from around the world have come together since 2016 to share, learn, collaborate and influence emerging practice. This group meets under the name of the Ensuring Value in Research Funders' Forum (EViR Funders' Forum). The EViR Funders' Forum worked together to develop a set of ten Guiding Principles, that if funders adhered to would reduce research waste and ensure value in research. Results: The EViR Funders' Forum has previously agreed and published a Consensus Statement. The Forum has agreed on a set of ten Guiding Principles to help health-research funders to maximise the value of research by ensuring that: research priorities are justifiable; the design, conduct and analysis of research minimise bias; regulation and management are proportionate to risks; methods and findings are accessible in full; and findings are appropriately and effectively disseminated and used. Conclusions: When setting research funding policy, we must balance multiple stakeholders' needs and expectations. When funders do this well, they maximise the probability of benefits to society from the research they support - when funders do this badly, they passively allow or actively contribute to research waste. These challenges must be resolved by funders either working together or in conjunction with other actors in the research ecosystem.

Keywords: funding agency; funding policy; international forum; research funding; transparency; value in research; waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Kelly Dunham is employed by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and Evelyn Whitlock was previously employed by PCORI. The views presented in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PCORI, its Board of Governors, or its Methodology Committee.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. EViR engagement across the world.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. EViR Consensus Statement.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Summary of Funders’ Forum Guiding Principles and conceptual model.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. EViR “value” definition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boutron I, Ravaud P, Graham I, et al. : Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: Who's listening? Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1573–1586. - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P: Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86–89. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cody A, Hiney M, Clarke P, et al. : Funders’ responsibility to ensure value in research: a self-audit by the Health Research Board Ireland [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. HRB Open Res. 2021;4:35. 10.12688/hrbopenres.13224.2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasziou P, Chalmers I: Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers. BMJ. 2018;k4645. 10.1136/bmj.k4645 - DOI
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Godlee F: All trials must be registered and the results published. BMJ. 2013;346(jan09 2):f105–f105. 10.1136/bmj.f105 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources