Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU
- PMID: 38846141
- PMCID: PMC11153762
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408636
Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU
Abstract
Patient experience data (PED), provided by patients/their carers without interpretation by clinicians, directly capture what matters more to patients on their medical condition, treatment and impact of healthcare. PED can be collected through different methodologies and these need to be robust and validated for its intended use. Medicine regulators are increasingly encouraging stakeholders to generate, collect and submit PED to support both scientific advice in development programs and regulatory decisions on the approval and use of these medicines. This article reviews the existing definitions and types of PED and demonstrate the potential for use in different settings of medicines' life cycle, focusing on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) and Patient Preferences (PP). Furthermore, it addresses some challenges and opportunities, alluding to important regulatory guidance that has been published, methodological aspects and digitalization, highlighting the lack of guidance as a key hurdle to achieve more systematic inclusion of PED in regulatory submissions. In addition, the article discusses opportunities at European and global level that could be implemented to leverage PED use. New digital tools that allow patients to collect PED in real time could also contribute to these advances, but it is equally important not to overlook the challenges they entail. The numerous and relevant initiatives being developed by various stakeholders in this field, including regulators, show their confidence in PED's value and create an ideal moment to address challenges and consolidate PED use across medicines' life cycle.
Keywords: challenges; decision-making; guidance; opportunities; patient experience data; patient preferences; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory.
Copyright © 2024 Almeida, Umuhire, Gonzalez-Quevedo, António, Burgos, Verpillat, Bere, Sepodes and Torre.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium guidance.Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;36(12):1129-49. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0113-z. Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 24092596 Free PMC article.
-
Current Practices and Challenges When Submitting Patient Experience Data for Regulatory Decisions by the US Food and Drug Administration: An Industry Survey.Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):147-159. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00653-8. Epub 2023 Dec 12. Patient. 2024. PMID: 38085458 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 4;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0875-z. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019. PMID: 31585538 Free PMC article.
-
Achieving equal and timely access to innovative anticancer drugs in the European Union (EU): summary of a multidisciplinary CECOG-driven roundtable discussion with a focus on Eastern and South-Eastern EU countries.ESMO Open. 2019 Nov 13;4(6):e000550. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000550. eCollection 2019. ESMO Open. 2019. PMID: 31798977 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: Where Are We Today?Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul;59(4):737-752. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00770-6. Epub 2025 Apr 10. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025. PMID: 40210822 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimizing Patient Registries for Regulatory Decision Making - Key Learnings From an HMA/EMA Multistakeholder Workshop.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;118(3):551-560. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3733. Epub 2025 Jun 2. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025. PMID: 40457718 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What Are the Experiences, Views and Perceptions of Patients, Carers and Clinicians of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs)? A Scoping Review.Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70251. doi: 10.1111/hex.70251. Health Expect. 2025. PMID: 40227008 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials and in clinical practice: report from the XXI national conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;4(1):e000783. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783. eCollection 2025. BMJ Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40546927 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bertelsen N, Dewulf L, Ferrè S, Vermeulen R, Schroeder K, Gatellier L, et al. . Patient engagement and patient experience data in regulatory review and health technology assessment: a global landscape review. Ther Innov Regul Sci. (2023) 58:63–78. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00573-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Willgoss T, Escontrias OA, Scrafton C, Oehrlein E, Livingstone V, Chaplin FC, et al. . Co-creation of the global patient experience data navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making. Res Involv Engagem. (2023) 9:92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous