Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 23:11:1408636.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408636. eCollection 2024.

Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU

Affiliations
Review

Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU

Diogo Almeida et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Patient experience data (PED), provided by patients/their carers without interpretation by clinicians, directly capture what matters more to patients on their medical condition, treatment and impact of healthcare. PED can be collected through different methodologies and these need to be robust and validated for its intended use. Medicine regulators are increasingly encouraging stakeholders to generate, collect and submit PED to support both scientific advice in development programs and regulatory decisions on the approval and use of these medicines. This article reviews the existing definitions and types of PED and demonstrate the potential for use in different settings of medicines' life cycle, focusing on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) and Patient Preferences (PP). Furthermore, it addresses some challenges and opportunities, alluding to important regulatory guidance that has been published, methodological aspects and digitalization, highlighting the lack of guidance as a key hurdle to achieve more systematic inclusion of PED in regulatory submissions. In addition, the article discusses opportunities at European and global level that could be implemented to leverage PED use. New digital tools that allow patients to collect PED in real time could also contribute to these advances, but it is equally important not to overlook the challenges they entail. The numerous and relevant initiatives being developed by various stakeholders in this field, including regulators, show their confidence in PED's value and create an ideal moment to address challenges and consolidate PED use across medicines' life cycle.

Keywords: challenges; decision-making; guidance; opportunities; patient experience data; patient preferences; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bergerum C, Engström AK, Thor J, Wolmesjö M. Patient involvement in quality improvement – a ‘tug of war’ or a dialogue in a learning process to improve healthcare? BMC Health Serv Res. (2020) 20:1115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05970-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertelsen N, Dewulf L, Ferrè S, Vermeulen R, Schroeder K, Gatellier L, et al. . Patient engagement and patient experience data in regulatory review and health technology assessment: a global landscape review. Ther Innov Regul Sci. (2023) 58:63–78. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00573-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen MB, Nørgaard LS, Hallgreen CE. How and why to involve patients in drug development: perspectives from the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, and patient organizations. Ther Innov Regul Sci. (2019) 7:216847901986429. doi: 10.1177/2168479019864294 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willgoss T, Escontrias OA, Scrafton C, Oehrlein E, Livingstone V, Chaplin FC, et al. . Co-creation of the global patient experience data navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making. Res Involv Engagem. (2023) 9:92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy A, Bere N, Vamvakas S, Mavris M. The added value of patient engagement in early dialogue at EMA: scientific advice as a case study. Front Med. (2022) 8:855. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.811855 - DOI - PMC - PubMed