Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;3(4):431-440.
doi: 10.1038/s44161-024-00453-9. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Effectiveness of glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk

Affiliations

Effectiveness of glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk

Rozalina G McCoy et al. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among people with type 2 diabetes1-5, most of whom are at moderate CVD risk6, yet there is limited evidence on the preferred choice of glucose-lowering medication for CVD risk reduction in this population. Here, we report the results of a retrospective cohort study where data for US adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate risk for CVD are used to compare the risks of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event with initiation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA; n = 44,188), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i; n = 47,094), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i; n = 84,315) and sulfonylureas (n = 210,679). Compared to DPP4i, GLP-1RA (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.93) and SGLT2i (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.81-0.90) were associated with a lower risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event, whereas sulfonylureas were associated with a higher risk (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.16-1.22). Thus, GLP-1RA and SGLT2i may be the preferred glucose-lowering agents for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients at moderate baseline risk for CVD. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05214573.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Extended Data Fig. 1 |
Extended Data Fig. 1 |. Study Design.
CVD, cardiovascular disease. MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event.
Fig. 1 |
Fig. 1 |. Cumulative incidence of study outcomes.
Cumulative hazards for MACE (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (composite of MACE, hospitalizations for heart failure and revascularization procedure endpoints), all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, HHF and revascularization procedure.

References

    1. Baena-Díez JM et al. Risk of cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes: a competing risks analysis. Diabetes Care 39, 1987–1995 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Rao Kondapally Seshasai S. et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 829–841 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tancredi M. et al. Excess mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes. New Engl. J. Med. 373, 1720–1732 (2015). - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2017. Diabetes Care 41, 917–928 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C. & Panton UH Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 17, 83 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

Associated data