"If I chose to listen to people, I possibly wouldn't be using family planning": Impact of external influences on women's contraceptive autonomy in rural Northwest Tanzania
- PMID: 38847324
- PMCID: PMC11162122
- DOI: 10.1177/17455057241259173
"If I chose to listen to people, I possibly wouldn't be using family planning": Impact of external influences on women's contraceptive autonomy in rural Northwest Tanzania
Abstract
Background: There is an increasing emphasis on promoting women's autonomy in reproductive decision-making, particularly given global efforts to increase contraceptive access and uptake. Scales to quantify autonomy have inconsistently included the effect of external influences and focused primarily on influences of partners.
Objectives: This study aimed to gain greater depth in understanding how influences including and beyond a woman's partner affect her contraceptive decision-making, as well as how external influences can overlap and further complicate contraceptive decision-making.
Design: A phenomenological, qualitative study in which in-depth interviews were conducted in three phases from May 2021 to February 2022 with women living in northwest Tanzania who had varying histories of contraceptive use or non-use.
Methods: One-on-one, in-depth interviews were conducted in Swahili, the national language of Tanzania, by trained female interviewers. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and independently coded by three investigators. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. The codes developed from the transcripts were grouped into overarching themes with supporting illustrative quotes.
Results: A total of 72 women were interviewed. Partners were the most influential in women's family planning decision-making, followed by friends, relatives, community religious leaders, and healthcare providers. Out of the 52 women with a partner who had ever used family planning, 76.9% had discussed their desire to use family planning with their partner and nearly all reported strong pressures to use or not to use family planning from partners, family, and friends. Rarely, participants stated that they were devoid of any influence.
Conclusion: In rural Tanzania, women's decision-making about family planning was highly impacted by external influences, including not only partners but also family, friends, and community. Indicators of women's reproductive autonomy and measurements of interventions to promote contraceptive use should incorporate measures of these external influences.
Keywords: contraception; contraceptive autonomy; family planning.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Proposed changes to framework to assess contraceptive autonomy based on phased in-depth interviews in northwest Tanzania.Reprod Health. 2025 Feb 15;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-01963-w. Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39955598 Free PMC article.
-
"I was told it was the pill that suits me": A qualitative study of women's perceptions and experiences of medical reasons for non-preferred contraceptive use.Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251358983. doi: 10.1177/17455057251358983. Epub 2025 Jul 28. Womens Health (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40726097 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231177848. doi: 10.1177/00469580231177848. Inquiry. 2023. PMID: 37249097 Free PMC article.
-
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.pub2. PMID: 12137636 Updated.
-
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 09;(8):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub3. PMID: 23440846 Updated.
References
-
- Senderowicz L. Contraceptive autonomy: conceptions and measurement of a novel family planning indicator. Stud Fam Plann 2020; 51(2): 161–176. - PubMed
-
- Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, et al.. Contraception and health. Lancet 2012; 380(9837): 149–156. - PubMed
-
- Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet 2012; 380(9837): 165–171. - PubMed
-
- Upadhyay UD, Dworkin SL, Weitz TA, et al.. Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale. Stud Fam Plann 2014; 45(1): 19–41. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical