Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan-Dec:20:17455057241259173.
doi: 10.1177/17455057241259173.

"If I chose to listen to people, I possibly wouldn't be using family planning": Impact of external influences on women's contraceptive autonomy in rural Northwest Tanzania

Affiliations

"If I chose to listen to people, I possibly wouldn't be using family planning": Impact of external influences on women's contraceptive autonomy in rural Northwest Tanzania

Valencia J Lambert et al. Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing emphasis on promoting women's autonomy in reproductive decision-making, particularly given global efforts to increase contraceptive access and uptake. Scales to quantify autonomy have inconsistently included the effect of external influences and focused primarily on influences of partners.

Objectives: This study aimed to gain greater depth in understanding how influences including and beyond a woman's partner affect her contraceptive decision-making, as well as how external influences can overlap and further complicate contraceptive decision-making.

Design: A phenomenological, qualitative study in which in-depth interviews were conducted in three phases from May 2021 to February 2022 with women living in northwest Tanzania who had varying histories of contraceptive use or non-use.

Methods: One-on-one, in-depth interviews were conducted in Swahili, the national language of Tanzania, by trained female interviewers. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and independently coded by three investigators. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. The codes developed from the transcripts were grouped into overarching themes with supporting illustrative quotes.

Results: A total of 72 women were interviewed. Partners were the most influential in women's family planning decision-making, followed by friends, relatives, community religious leaders, and healthcare providers. Out of the 52 women with a partner who had ever used family planning, 76.9% had discussed their desire to use family planning with their partner and nearly all reported strong pressures to use or not to use family planning from partners, family, and friends. Rarely, participants stated that they were devoid of any influence.

Conclusion: In rural Tanzania, women's decision-making about family planning was highly impacted by external influences, including not only partners but also family, friends, and community. Indicators of women's reproductive autonomy and measurements of interventions to promote contraceptive use should incorporate measures of these external influences.

Keywords: contraception; contraceptive autonomy; family planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Socio-ecological model depicting interpersonal and community-level influences that affect a woman’s use of contraception.

Similar articles

References

    1. Senderowicz L. Contraceptive autonomy: conceptions and measurement of a novel family planning indicator. Stud Fam Plann 2020; 51(2): 161–176. - PubMed
    1. Leal Filho W, Kovaleva M, Tsani S, et al.. Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals. Environ Dev Sustain 2023; 25: 14177–14198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, et al.. Contraception and health. Lancet 2012; 380(9837): 149–156. - PubMed
    1. Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet 2012; 380(9837): 165–171. - PubMed
    1. Upadhyay UD, Dworkin SL, Weitz TA, et al.. Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale. Stud Fam Plann 2014; 45(1): 19–41. - PubMed

Publication types