Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Aug 1;49(8):e383-e389.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005284. Epub 2024 May 31.

Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients With Lymph Node Metastasis Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy: Comparative Analysis of PSMA PET/CT and Conventional Imaging

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients With Lymph Node Metastasis Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy: Comparative Analysis of PSMA PET/CT and Conventional Imaging

Cem Onal et al. Clin Nucl Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT compared with conventional imaging on treatment outcomes for node-positive prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and external radiotherapy (RT).

Patients and methods: A multicentric, retrospective study recruited patients with node-positive PCa patients who underwent conventional radiological evaluation or PSMA PET/CT and received ADT and RT at 3 hospitals from 2009 to 2021 were enrolled. Patients underwent prostate and pelvis RT, accompanied by a minimum of 6 months of ADT. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and PCa-specific survival (PCSS). Cox regression analyzed the association of survival with potential prognostic factors, whereas logistic regression identified the predictors of bone and lymph node metastasis.

Results: The median follow-up time was 64.0 months. The majority of patients (64.1%) underwent PSMA PET/CT for staging. The 5-year rates of PFS and PCSS were 63.7% and 83.7%, respectively. Disease progression was observed in 90 patients (36.3%). In multivariable analysis, ADT duration of less than 24 months and post-RT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir were prognostic for PFS. Early clinical T stage and PSMA PET/CT predicted better PCSS. Patients staged with PSMA PET/CT had exhibited significantly higher 5-year PCSS rates than compared with those staged with conventional imaging (95.1% vs 76.9%; P = 0.01). Shorter ADT duration and higher PSA levels after RT independently predicted bone metastasis in multivariable logistic regression. Advanced T stage, shorter ADT duration, and higher PSA levels after neoadjuvant ADT predicted nonregional lymph node recurrence.

Conclusions: ADT with pelvis RT is an effective treatment option for node-positive PCa patients. The PSMA PET/CT outperformed conventional imaging in PCSS, emphasizing the importance of precise clinical staging for patients undergoing definitive RT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin . 2023;73:17–48.
    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol . 2017;71:618–629.
    1. James ND, Spears MR, Clarke NW, et al. Failure-free survival and radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic prostate cancer: data from patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial. JAMA Oncol . 2016;2:348–357.
    1. Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet . 2018;392:2353–2366.
    1. Lin CC, Gray PJ, Jemal A, et al. Androgen deprivation with or without radiation therapy for clinically node-positive prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst . 2015;107:djv119.