Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38334.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038334.

Effect of herbal medicine on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of herbal medicine on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Na-Yeon Ha et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, herbal medicines have been used to alleviate nausea and vomiting; however, a comprehensive clinical evaluation for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), especially after laparoscopic surgery, remains limited. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine as an alternative therapy to prevent and manage nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery compared with untreated, placebo, and Western medicine groups.

Methods: We searched 11 databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of herbal medicines on PONV after laparoscopic surgery on July 7, 2022. Two independent reviewers screened and selected eligible studies, extracted clinical data, and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, whereas the secondary outcomes included the frequency and intensity of PONV, symptom improvement time, antiemetic requirement frequency, and incidence of adverse events. Review Manager Version 5.3. was used for the meta-analysis.

Results: We identified 19 RCTs with 2726 participants comparing herbal medicine with no treatment, placebo, and Western medicine. The findings showed that compared with no treatment, herbal medicine demonstrated significant effects on vomiting incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.57, P < .00001). Compared with placebo, herbal medicine revealed a significant effect on the severity of nausea 12 hours after laparoscopic surgery (standardized mean difference = -2.04, 95% CI -3.67 to -0.41, P = .01). Herbal medicines showed similar effects with Western medicine on the incidence of postoperative nausea (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.42, P = .77) and vomiting (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.25-1.84, P = .45). Furthermore, comparing the experimental group containing herbal medicine and control group excluding herbal medicine, adverse events were considerably lower in the group with herbal medicine (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P = .001).

Conclusion: Herbal medicine is an effective and safe treatment for nausea and vomiting secondary to laparoscopic surgery. However, the number of studies was small and their quality was not high; thus, more well-designed RCTs are warranted in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the study selection process. AMED = Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CENTRAL = Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CiNii = Citation Information by Nii, CNKI = China National Knowledge Infrastructure, KISS = Korean Studies Information Service System, KMbase = Korean Medical Database, NDSL = National Digital Science Library, OASIS = Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk of bias graph.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Risk of bias summary.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot of the comparison for the incidence of vomiting between herbal medicine and no treatment.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest plot of the comparison for the incidence of nausea between herbal medicine and placebo.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Forest plot of the comparison for the incidence of vomiting between herbal medicine and placebo.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Forest plot of the comparison for the incidence of nausea between herbal medicine and Western medicine.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Forest plot of the comparison for the incidence of vomiting between herbal medicine and Western medicine.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Forest plot of the comparison for the frequency of vomiting between herbal medicine and no treatment.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Forest plot of the comparison for the severity of nausea between herbal medicine and placebo; (A) 0 hour, (B) 2 hours, (C) 6 hours, (D) 12 hours, and (E) 24 hours after surgery.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Forest plot of the comparison for the use of antiemetics between herbal medicine and placebo.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Forest plot of the comparison for the incidence of adverse events between the experimental and control groups. CT = combination therapy, HM = herbal medicine, WM = Western medicine.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Funnel plot of the comparison for the incidence of adverse events between the experimental and control groups. CT = combination therapy, HM = herbal medicine, WM = Western medicine.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kenward H, Pelligand L, Savary-Bataille K, Elliott J. Nausea: current knowledge of mechanisms, measurement and clinical impact. Vet J. 2015;203:36–43. - PubMed
    1. Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2000;59:213–43. - PubMed
    1. Acalovschi I. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2002;13:37–43.
    1. Habib AS, Gan TJ. Combination therapy for postoperative nausea and vomiting–a more effective prophylaxis? Ambul Surg. 2001;9:59–71. - PubMed
    1. Carr BM, Lyon JA, Romeiser J, Talamini M, Shroyer ALW. Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:1693–709. - PubMed

MeSH terms