Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine Reversal on Postoperative Recovery Time in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 38848257
- PMCID: PMC11805487
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007013
Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine Reversal on Postoperative Recovery Time in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Residual neuromuscular blockade can be associated with serious postoperative complications. Sugammadex is a newer neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) reversal agent that rapidly and completely reverses rocuronium. Whether sugammadex has any advantages over neostigmine in morbidly obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is unclear. We investigated whether sugammadex would reduce discharge time from the operating room (OR) compared with neostigmine in morbidly obese patients with OSA undergoing bariatric surgery.
Methods: This was a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled superiority trial with 2 parallel groups. Patients were randomized 1:1 into reversal of NMBD with sugammadex or neostigmine. Our inclusion criteria were morbidly obese adult patients with OSA undergoing elective bariatric surgery under general anesthesia. Our exclusion criteria were allergy to rocuronium, sugammadex or neostigmine, malignant hyperthermia, hepatic or renal insufficiency, neuromuscular diseases, and an inability to give consent. The primary outcome was the time from administration of the NMBD reversal agent to discharge from the OR. Secondary outcomes included the time from administration of the NMBD reversal agent to the time the patient opened eyes to command, and the time to extubation. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the outcomes between treatment groups.
Results: We randomized 120 patients into 2 groups of 60 patients. Overall median body mass index (BMI) was 48.1 kg/m 2 ([interquartile range, IQR]) [43.0-53.5]. The time from drug administration to discharge from OR was 13.0 minutes [10.0-17.0] in the sugammadex group and 13.5 minutes [11.0-18.3] in the neostigmine group ( P = .27). The treatment effect estimate with a bootstrapped 95% confidence interval [CI] for time from admission to discharge from OR was -0.5 [-2.5 to 3]. No differences were observed in postoperative complications and other secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: No difference was observed in OR discharge time in morbidly obese patients with OSA when sugammadex was administered instead of neostigmine.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Anesthesia Research Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article.
Similar articles
-
Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Rocuronium Neuromuscular Block in Patients Having Catheter-Based Neurointerventional Procedures: A Randomized Trial.Anesth Analg. 2021 Jun 1;132(6):1666-1676. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005533. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 34032663 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex or neostigmine on postoperative quality of recovery following a single bolus dose of rocuronium: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Mar 30. J Clin Anesth. 2019. PMID: 30939422 Clinical Trial.
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Rocuronium on Gastric Emptying in Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery.Anesth Analg. 2025 Aug 1;141(2):373-383. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007518. Epub 2025 May 6. Anesth Analg. 2025. PMID: 40327558 Clinical Trial.
-
Postoperative complications with neuromuscular blocking drugs and/or reversal agents in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review.BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul 19;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0549-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018. PMID: 30025517 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Aug 4. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27871504 Review.
Cited by
-
Sugammadex Safely Reduces Total Intubation Time in the Intensive Care Unit Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) at a Real-World Community Hospital.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1660. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051660. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40095646 Free PMC article.
-
Pulmonary complications associated with sugammadex or neostigmine in patients recovering from advanced diagnostic or interventional bronchoscopy: a retrospective two-centre analysis.Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;135(1):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.039. Epub 2025 Mar 14. Br J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40089395
-
Sugammadex for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 11;14(12):4128. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124128. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565874 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fortier L-P, McKeen D, Turner K, et al. . The RECITE study: a Canadian prospective, multicenter study of the incidence and severity of residual neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:366–372. - PubMed
-
- Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:120–128. - PubMed
-
- Fuchs-Buder T, Nemes R, Schmartz D. Residual neuromuscular blockade: management and impact on postoperative pulmonary outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29:662–667. - PubMed
-
- Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:130–137. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical