To Preserve or Extract? A Scoping Review and a Prognostic Decision Tool Using Multispecialty Indicators
- PMID: 38848508
- DOI: 10.11607/ijp.9068
To Preserve or Extract? A Scoping Review and a Prognostic Decision Tool Using Multispecialty Indicators
Abstract
Because implant-supported restorations have become very popular, there is a tendency to extract teeth and replace them with implants. However, the first goal of dentistry should always be the preservation of natural teeth, given the prerequisite that these can be maintained with the application of appropriate treatment modalities. Therefore, individual tooth risk assessment and prognosis are very important for the treatment planning process. Four important factors influencing the dentist's decision on whether to save or extract a compromised tooth have been identified, and an extensive search of the related English language literature has been performed. Additionally, a hand search in related journals was implemented, and classic textbooks were consulted. Identified articles on patient-related, periodontal, endodontic, and restorative factors were thoroughly analyzed, focusing on diagnosis and tooth prognosis. A total of 52 references were carefully selected and reviewed. Available information was used to develop a color-coded prognostic decision chart with four different factors and up to 14 crucial parameters. All factors and parameters were analyzed in an effort to help the restorative dentist make a prognostic decision. The proposed color-coded prognostic decision chart can be helpful when a treatment plan is made and predictable restorative care is planned. This comprehensive prognostic decision chart can aid dentists in providing clinical care of high quality and in establishing a consensus on available restorative options. It can additionally help to establish appropriate communication with patients and third-party individuals in the restorative care process, effectively manage risk factors, and provide a framework for quality assessment in restorative treatment.
Similar articles
-
A novel decision-making process for tooth retention or extraction.J Periodontol. 2009 Mar;80(3):476-91. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080454. J Periodontol. 2009. PMID: 19254132
-
Endodontics or implants? A review of decisive criteria and guidelines for single tooth restorations and full arch reconstructions.Int Endod J. 2009 Sep;42(9):757-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01561.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22. Int Endod J. 2009. PMID: 19548936 Review.
-
Novel decision tree algorithms for the treatment planning of compromised teeth.Quintessence Int. 2013 Jan;44(1):75-84. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a28738. Quintessence Int. 2013. PMID: 23444165
-
The Fractured Endodontically Treated Maxillary Anterior Tooth: Restore or Replace?Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;42(7):366-371; quiz 372. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2021. PMID: 34297590
-
[Preserving the natural tooth versus extraction and implant placement: making a rational clinical decision].Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2010 Jan;27(1):37-46, 75. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2010. PMID: 20597259 Review. Hebrew.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources