Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 9:371:fnae041.
doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnae041.

The differential assimilation of nitrogen fertilizer compounds by soil microorganisms

Affiliations

The differential assimilation of nitrogen fertilizer compounds by soil microorganisms

Alice F Charteris et al. FEMS Microbiol Lett. .

Abstract

The differential soil microbial assimilation of common nitrogen (N) fertilizer compounds into the soil organic N pool is revealed using novel compound-specific amino acid (AA) 15N-stable isotope probing. The incorporation of fertilizer 15N into individual AAs reflected the known biochemistry of N assimilation-e.g. 15N-labelled ammonium (15NH4+) was assimilated most quickly and to the greatest extent into glutamate. A maximum of 12.9% of applied 15NH4+, or 11.7% of 'retained' 15NH4+ (remaining in the soil) was assimilated into the total hydrolysable AA pool in the Rowden Moor soil. Incorporation was lowest in the Rowden Moor 15N-labelled nitrate (15NO3-) treatment, at 1.7% of applied 15N or 1.6% of retained 15N. Incorporation in the 15NH4+ and 15NO3- treatments in the Winterbourne Abbas soil, and the 15N-urea treatment in both soils was between 4.4% and 6.5% of applied 15N or 5.2% and 6.4% of retained 15N. This represents a key step in greater comprehension of the microbially mediated transformations of fertilizer N to organic N and contributes to a more complete picture of soil N-cycling. The approach also mechanistically links theoretical/pure culture derived biochemical expectations and bulk level fertilizer immobilization studies, bridging these different scales of understanding.

Keywords: 15N stable isotope tracing (SIP); amino acids; ammonium; immobilization; nitrate; urea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Time–course plots of AA Δ15N values revealing 15N assimilation into individual AAs in the six treatments. (A) RM-15NO3 , (B) WA-15NO3 (error bars at t = 16 and 32 days are coloured to aid differentiation), (C) RM-15NH4+, (D) WA-15NH4+, (E) RM-15N-U, and (F) WA-15N-U. RM and WA refer to the two different soils from the two sites, RM and WA and the three amendments were potassium nitrate (K15NO3), ammonium chloride (15NH4Cl), and urea (CO(15NH2)2). Error bars are ± SE (n = 3). See Supplementary Fig. S3. For individual figures for each AA in each treatment for additional clarity.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time–course plots of AA % 15NR incorporations revealing 15N assimilation into individual AAs in the six treatments, alongside pie charts of the relative percentage of retained 15N in each AA pool this represented, based on the plateau partitioning of 15N in each total hydrolyzable AA pool (derived from simple exponential regressions of the % 15NR incorporated into AAs over time; Equation 1). (A) RM-15NO3 (error bars for Ala and Gly are coloured to aid differentiation), (B) WA-15NO3 (error bars for Glu, Asp, and Ala are coloured to aid differentiation), (C) RM-15NH4+, (D) WA-15NH4+, (E) RM-15N-U, and (F) WA-15N-U. Error bars are ± SE (n = 3). Adapted from Charteris (2019).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percentage of 15N incorporated into the total hydrolyzable AA pool for all treatments, labelled with the plateau % 15NR incorporations determined by simple exponential regressions. (A) Percentage of applied 15N and (B) Percentage of the 15N still present in the soil or ‘retained’ at that time. Error bars are ± SE (n = 3), the error bars of the WA-15NO3 treatment are highlighted in red as the bar at t = 32 days is large and otherwise difficult to distinguish. Adapted from Charteris (2019).

Similar articles

References

    1. Booth MS, Stark JM, Rastetter E. Controls on nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: a synthetic analysis of literature data. Ecol Monogr. 2005;75:139–57.
    1. Bunch ND, Bernot MJ. Nitrate and ammonium uptake by natural stream sediment microbial communities in response to nutrient enrichment. Res Microbiol. 2012;163:137–41. - PubMed
    1. Cascante M, Marin S. Metabolomics and fluxomics approaches. Essays Biochem. 2008;45:67–81. 10.1042/bse0450067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Černý J, Balík J, Pavlíková Det al. . The influence of organic and mineral nitrogen fertilisers on microbial biomass nitrogen and extractable organic nitrogen in long-term experiments with maize. Plant Soil Environ. 2003;49:560–4.
    1. Charteris AF, Knowles TDJ, Michaelides Ket al. . Compound-specific amino acid 15N stable isotope probing of nitrogen assimilation by the soil microbial biomass using gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2016;30:1846–56. 10.1002/rcm.7612. - DOI - PMC - PubMed