Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;35(2):159-180.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review

Affiliations

Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review

Christa J C de Geus et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to identify vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions that are effective to enhance return-to-work (RTW) for people on long-term sick leave (> 90 days) and to identify main elements of these interventions.

Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published up to February 2022. Each article was screened independently by two different reviewers. Thereafter, one author performed the data-extraction which was checked by another author. The EPHPP quality assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies.

Results: 11.837 articles were identified. 21 articles were included in the review, which described 25 interventions. Results showed that ten interventions were more effective than usual care on RTW. Two interventions had mixed results. The effective interventions varied widely in content, but were often more extensive than usual care. Common elements of the effective interventions were: coaching, counseling and motivational interviewing, planning return to work, placing the worker in work or teaching practical skills and advising at the workplace. However, these elements were also common in interventions that were not effective on RTW compared to usual care and can therefore not explain why certain interventions are effective and others are not.

Conclusion: The effective interventions included in this study were often quite extensive and aimed at multiple phases of the RTW-process of the worker. In the future, researchers need to describe the population and the content of the investigated interventions more elaborate to be able to better compare VR interventions and determine what elements make interventions effective.

Keywords: Disability pension; Intervention; RTW; Vocational rehabilitation; Work disability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing Interests: HJvR was employed at the Dutch Social Security Institute while this study was carried out. JRA is advisor of Amsterdam University Medical Center’s spin-off companies Evalua Nederland BV and IKherstel BV. JRA holds a chair in Insurance Medicine sponsored by the Dutch Social Security Institute. CdG, MMB and MAH are partly paid by the Dutch SSI. Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam. The committee declared that no comprehensive ethical approval was needed for this study. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the search and selection procedure of studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mikkelsen MB, Rosholm M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at enhancing return to work for sick-listed workers with common mental disorders, stress-related disorders, somatoform disorders and personality disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75(9):675–86. - PubMed
    1. Eklund M, Hansson L, Ahlqvist C. The importance of work as compared to other forms of daily occupations for wellbeing and functioning among persons with long-term mental illness. Commun Ment Health J. 2004;40(5):465–77. - PubMed
    1. Milner A, LaMontagne A, Aitken Z, Bentley R, Kavanagh AM. Employment status and mental health among persons with and without a disability: evidence from an Australian cohort study. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2014;68(11):1064–71. - PubMed
    1. Henderson M, Glozier N, Elliott KH. Long term sickness absence. British Med J Publ Gr. 2005. 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.802. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Publishing O. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources