Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research
- PMID: 38849807
- PMCID: PMC11157929
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01068-2
Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research
Abstract
Background: Genetic research can yield information that is unrelated to the study's objectives but may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. There is an emerging but controversial responsibility to return some genetic research results, however there is little evidence available about the views of genomic researchers and others on the African continent.
Methods: We conducted a continental survey to solicit perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.
Results: A total of 110 persons participated in the survey with 51 complete and 59 incomplete surveys received. Data was summarised using descriptive analysis. Overall, our respondents believed that individual genetic research results that are clinically actionable should be returned to study participants apparently because participants have a right to know things about their health, and it might also be a means for research participation to be recognized. Nonetheless, there is a need for development of precise guidance on how to return individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.
Discussion: Participants should receive information that could promote a healthier lifestyle; only clinically actionable findings should be returned, and participants should receive all important information that is directly relevant to their health. Nevertheless, detailed guidelines should inform what ought to be returned. H3Africa guidelines stipulate that it is generally considered good practice for researchers to feedback general study results, but there is no consensus about whether individual genomic study results should also be fed back. The decision on what individual results to feedback, if any, is very challenging and the specific context is important to make an appropriate determination.
Keywords: Africa; Feedback; Genomics research; Incidental findings; Individual genetic research results.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures










Similar articles
-
Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research.Genet Med. 2014 Apr;16(4):311-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.140. Epub 2013 Sep 26. Genet Med. 2014. PMID: 24071801 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28153006 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective.J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):403-415. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9856-7. Epub 2018 May 16. J Bioeth Inq. 2018. PMID: 29767375
-
Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa.BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Sep 11;14:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-35. BMC Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 24025667 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical considerations for biobanking and use of genomics data in Africa: a narrative review.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 5;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00985-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 38053109 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources