Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 7;25(1):67.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01068-2.

Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research

Affiliations

Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research

Faith Musvipwa et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Genetic research can yield information that is unrelated to the study's objectives but may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. There is an emerging but controversial responsibility to return some genetic research results, however there is little evidence available about the views of genomic researchers and others on the African continent.

Methods: We conducted a continental survey to solicit perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.

Results: A total of 110 persons participated in the survey with 51 complete and 59 incomplete surveys received. Data was summarised using descriptive analysis. Overall, our respondents believed that individual genetic research results that are clinically actionable should be returned to study participants apparently because participants have a right to know things about their health, and it might also be a means for research participation to be recognized. Nonetheless, there is a need for development of precise guidance on how to return individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.

Discussion: Participants should receive information that could promote a healthier lifestyle; only clinically actionable findings should be returned, and participants should receive all important information that is directly relevant to their health. Nevertheless, detailed guidelines should inform what ought to be returned. H3Africa guidelines stipulate that it is generally considered good practice for researchers to feedback general study results, but there is no consensus about whether individual genomic study results should also be fed back. The decision on what individual results to feedback, if any, is very challenging and the specific context is important to make an appropriate determination.

Keywords: Africa; Feedback; Genomics research; Incidental findings; Individual genetic research results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Returning individual genetic results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Views on returning genetic results to paediatric patients. *Data are number (percentage) of respondents. Because the question required a tick all that applies, percentages may not add up to 100 they are more.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kinds of genetic results to be feedback
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
At which point should consent to receive findings be given
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Disclosing results when participant chose not to receive
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Actionable findings
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Standard of care
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Standard of care across different projects
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Reproductive decision making
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Cost of feeding back findings

Similar articles

References

    1. Sullivan HK, Berkman BE. Incidental findings in low-resource settings. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018;48(3):20–8. doi: 10.1002/hast.851. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vears DF, Minion JT, Roberts SJ, Cummings J, Machirori M, Blell M, et al. Return of individual research results from genomic research: a systematic review of stakeholder perspectives. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ewuoso C. Ubuntu philosophy and the consensus regarding incidental findings in genomic research: a heuristic approach. Med Health Care Philos. 2020;23(3):433–44. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09953-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tindana P, Depuur C, De Vries J, Seeley J, Parker M. Informed consent in genomic research and biobanking: taking feedback of findings seriously. Global Bioeth. 2020;31(1):200–15. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2020.1717896. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ralefala D, Kasule M, Wonkam A, Matshaba M, De Vries J. Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research? BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1). 10.1186/s12910-020-00549-4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources