Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):219.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04517-y.

Unraveling the treatment effects of huanglian jiedu decoction on drug-induced liver injury based on network pharmacology, molecular docking and experimental validation

Affiliations

Unraveling the treatment effects of huanglian jiedu decoction on drug-induced liver injury based on network pharmacology, molecular docking and experimental validation

Yaochen Xie et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Huanglian Jiedu Decoction (HJD) is a well-known Traditional Chinese Medicine formula that has been used for liver protection in thousands of years. However, the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of HJD in treating drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain unknown. In this study, a total of 26 genes related to both HJD and DILI were identified, which are corresponding to a total of 41 potential active compounds in HJD. KEGG analysis revealed that Tryptophan metabolism pathway is particularly important. The overlapped genes from KEGG and GO analysis indicated the significance of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1. Experimental results confirmed that HJD has a protective effect on DILI through Tryptophan metabolism pathway. In addition, the active ingredients Corymbosin, and Moslosooflavone were found to have relative strong intensity in UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS analysis, showing interactions with CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 through molecule docking. These findings could provide insights into the treatment effects of HJD on DILI.

Keywords: Drug-induced liver injury; Huanglian Jiedu Decoction; Molecule docking; Network pharmacology; Q-TOF; Tryptophan metabolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The relationship between DILI targets and active ingredients in HJD. (A) The Venn diagram of drug targets, disease targets and their overlapping during network construction process of HJD and DILI. (B) The network between the overlapped targets and their related active compounds in HJD
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PPI network of the overlapped 26 potential targets that could be used in HJD for treating DILI
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pathway analysis of the protective effects HJD against DILI. (A) The most enriched pathways for KEGG; (B) The signaling transduction pathway of Tryptophan metabolism signaling pathway
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
GO enrichment analysis for the top 10 most significant terms in BP (A), CC (B), and MF (C)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Flow cytometry analysis for CYP1A1 (A-B), CYP1A2 (C-D), and CYP1B1 (E-F). Data are presented as **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Experimental validations of HJD treatment against DILI with three identical groups (Control, APAP, and APAP + HJD). (A) and (B) ALT and AST levels (n = 6 animals/group). (C) Representative H&E staining of liver where circled place indicates places of injury, scale bar: 300 μm. (D) Statistics of liver injury area (n = 3 animals/group); (E) Representative western blotting analysis of liver CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 expression levels in mice liver (n = 3 animals/group), Original images of blots are shown in Fig. S1.; (F) Liver 5-HT level (n = 3 animals/group); (G-H) qRT-PCR analysis of Maoa and Maob in mice liver (n = 3 animals/group). Data are presented as ns, p > 0.05; *, p < 0.05; **,  p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 compared with Control group; #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 compared with APAP group
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Molecule docking of active ingredients with potential targets. (A) The binding of CYP1A1 with Compound 70; (B) The binding of CYP1A2 with Compound 70; (C) The binding of CYP1B1 with Compound 83
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS analysis of active ingredients in HJD. (A) and (B) The intensity of Compound 70 and 83, and its retention time in UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS analysis; (C) and (D) Corresponding secondary mass spectra of Compound 70 and 83
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Graphical abstract of HJD treatment effect against APAP-induced liver injury

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kimura K, Kikegawa M, Kan Y, Uesawa Y. Identifying crude drugs in Kampo Medicines Associated with Drug-Induced Liver Injury using the Japanese adverse drug Event Report Database: a Comprehensive Survey. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(5):678. doi: 10.3390/ph16050678. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li X, Tang J, Mao Y. Incidence and risk factors of drug-induced liver injury. Liver Int. 2022;42(9):1999–2014. doi: 10.1111/liv.15262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo H, Chen S, Xie M, Zhou C, Zheng M. The complex roles of neutrophils in APAP-induced liver injury. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(6):e13040. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Terneus MV, Brown JM, Carpenter AB, Valentovic MA. Comparison of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) protective effects on hepatic damage when administered after acetaminophen overdose. Toxicology. 2008;244(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.10.027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma J-T, Xia S, Zhang B-K, Luo F, Guo L, Yang Y, Gong H, Yan M. The pharmacology and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine in promoting liver regeneration: a new therapeutic option. Phytomedicine 2023:154893. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances