Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):709.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11133-6.

"I probably have access, but I can't afford it": expanding definitions of affordability in access to contraceptive services among people with low income in Georgia, USA

Affiliations

"I probably have access, but I can't afford it": expanding definitions of affordability in access to contraceptive services among people with low income in Georgia, USA

Anna Newton-Levinson et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Disparities in rates of contraceptive use are frequently attributed to unequal access to and affordability of care. There is a need to better understand whether common definitions of affordability that solely relate to cost or to insurance status capture the reality of individuals' lived experiences. We sought to better understand how individuals with low incomes and the capacity for pregnancy conceptualized one domain of contraceptive access-affordability --in terms of health system and individual access and how both shaped contraceptive care-seeking in the US South.

Method: Between January 2019 to February 2020, we conducted twenty-five life-history interviews with low-income individuals who may become pregnant living in suburban counties in Georgia, USA. Interviews covered the ways individual and health system access factors influenced care-seeking for family planning over the life course. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to identify experiences associated with individual and health system access.

Results: Affordability was identified as a major determinant of access, one tied to unique combinations of individual factors (e.g., financial status) and health system characteristics (e.g., cost of methods) that fluctuated over time. Navigating the process to attain affordable care was unpredictable and had important implications for care-seeking. A "poor fit" between individual and health system factors could lead to inequities in access and gaps in, or non-use of contraception. Participants also reported high levels of shame and stigma associated with being uninsured or on publicly funded insurance.

Conclusions: Affordability is one domain of contraceptive access that is shaped by the interplay between individual factors and health system characteristics as well as by larger structural factors such as health and economic policies that influence both. Assessments of the affordability of contraceptive care must account for the dynamic interplay among multilevel influences. Despite the expansion of contraceptive coverage through the Affordable Care Act, low-income individuals still struggle with affordability and disparities persist.

Keywords: Access; Affordability; Contraception; Family planning; Health equity; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Defining individual affordability of family planning services and implications for care-seeking

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ross LJ, Solinger R. Reproductive Justice: an introduction. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; 2017.
    1. Sonfield A, et al. The Social and Economic benefits of women’s ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
    1. Dehlendorf C, et al. Disparities in Family Planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):214–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson AV, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in women’s preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2016;93(5):406–11. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shih G, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43(3):173–80. doi: 10.1363/4317311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources