"I probably have access, but I can't afford it": expanding definitions of affordability in access to contraceptive services among people with low income in Georgia, USA
- PMID: 38849826
- PMCID: PMC11157915
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11133-6
"I probably have access, but I can't afford it": expanding definitions of affordability in access to contraceptive services among people with low income in Georgia, USA
Abstract
Background: Disparities in rates of contraceptive use are frequently attributed to unequal access to and affordability of care. There is a need to better understand whether common definitions of affordability that solely relate to cost or to insurance status capture the reality of individuals' lived experiences. We sought to better understand how individuals with low incomes and the capacity for pregnancy conceptualized one domain of contraceptive access-affordability --in terms of health system and individual access and how both shaped contraceptive care-seeking in the US South.
Method: Between January 2019 to February 2020, we conducted twenty-five life-history interviews with low-income individuals who may become pregnant living in suburban counties in Georgia, USA. Interviews covered the ways individual and health system access factors influenced care-seeking for family planning over the life course. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to identify experiences associated with individual and health system access.
Results: Affordability was identified as a major determinant of access, one tied to unique combinations of individual factors (e.g., financial status) and health system characteristics (e.g., cost of methods) that fluctuated over time. Navigating the process to attain affordable care was unpredictable and had important implications for care-seeking. A "poor fit" between individual and health system factors could lead to inequities in access and gaps in, or non-use of contraception. Participants also reported high levels of shame and stigma associated with being uninsured or on publicly funded insurance.
Conclusions: Affordability is one domain of contraceptive access that is shaped by the interplay between individual factors and health system characteristics as well as by larger structural factors such as health and economic policies that influence both. Assessments of the affordability of contraceptive care must account for the dynamic interplay among multilevel influences. Despite the expansion of contraceptive coverage through the Affordable Care Act, low-income individuals still struggle with affordability and disparities persist.
Keywords: Access; Affordability; Contraception; Family planning; Health equity; Qualitative research.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
"So that I can trust them with my body:" How people with low incomes who may become pregnant define and prioritize quality reproductive health care.Contraception. 2024 Oct;138:110517. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110517. Epub 2024 Jun 15. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 38885892
-
The impact of US policy on contraceptive access: a policy analysis.Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01289-3. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34809673 Free PMC article.
-
Factors facilitating the use of contraceptive methods among urban adolescents and youth in Guinea: a qualitative study.Reprod Health. 2023 Jun 13;20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01621-z. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 37312141 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31013349 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Barriers and facilitators to women's access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11710-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39394094 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ross LJ, Solinger R. Reproductive Justice: an introduction. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; 2017.
-
- Sonfield A, et al. The Social and Economic benefits of women’s ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources