Readiness for return to work and its influencing factors among head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38850487
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08622-z
Readiness for return to work and its influencing factors among head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the Readiness for Return-to-Work (RRTW) of patients with head and neck tumours and to analyse the relationships among self-efficacy, disease uncertainty, psychosocial adaptation, and RRTW in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 259 HNC patients with a discharge length of ≥1 month at a tertiary hospital in Liaoning Province. The research tools included a self-designed general information questionnaire, the Readiness for Return-to-Work (RRTW) Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale (MUIS), and the Self-Reporting Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS-SR). Descriptive statistical analysis, the rank sum test, Spearman correlation analysis, and ordered multiple and dichotomous logistic regression analyses were used.
Results: The overall RRTW among HNC patients was low (41.9%). HNC patients who did not return to work were mainly in the precontemplation stage (38.1%) and contemplation stage (29.9%). HNC patients who returned to work were mainly in the active maintenance stage (64.2%). Children's status (OR = 0.218, 95% CI 0.068-0.703), self-efficacy (OR = 1.213, 95% CI 1.012-1.454), unpredictability (OR = 0.845, 95% CI 0.720-0.990), occupational environment (OR = 0.787, 95% CI 0.625-0.990), and family environment (OR = 0.798, 95% CI 0.643-0.990) influence the RRTW of HNC patients who have not returned to work. Educational level (OR = 62.196, 95% CI 63.307-68.567), children's status (OR = 0.058, 95% CI 1.004-2.547), self-efficacy (OR = 1.544, 95% CI 3.010-8.715), unpredictability (OR = 0.445, 95% CI 1.271-2.280), and psychological status (OR = 0.340, 95% CI 1.141-2.401) influence the RRTW of HNC patients who have returned to work.
Conclusion: Children's status, education level, self-efficacy, illness uncertainty, and psychosocial adjustment are crucial to RRTW. This study provides a theoretical basis for formulating intervention measures aimed at improving the RRTW of patients.
Keywords: Head and neck tumour; Illness uncertainty; Psychosocial adjustment; Readiness for return-to-work; Self-efficacy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O’Sullivan B et al (2017) Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. Ca Cancer J Clin 67(2):122–137. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21389
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Simard EP, Torre LA, Jemal A (2014) International trends in head and neck cancer incidence rates: differences by country, sex and anatomic site. Oral Oncol 50(5):387–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Xia C, Dong X, Li H et al (2022) Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl) 135(5):584–590. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abshire D, Lang MK (2018) The evolution of radiation therapy in treating cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 34(2):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials