Early feeding practices and eating behaviour in preschool children: The CORALS cohort
- PMID: 38853145
- PMCID: PMC11574645
- DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13672
Early feeding practices and eating behaviour in preschool children: The CORALS cohort
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate if the duration of breastfeeding and the method at initiation of complementary feeding affect eating behaviour in children aged 3-6 years. This is a cross-sectional analysis from the Childhood Obesity Risk Assessment Longitudinal Study project, an ongoing longitudinal cohort study that aims to identify childhood obesity risk factors in Spanish children. A total of 1215 children aged 3-6 years were included. Breastfeeding duration and the method of initiation of complementary feeding [baby-led weaning (BLW), traditional/spoon or mixed method] were evaluated. Eating behaviour at 3-6 years was assessed with the Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. Generalized linear models were fitted to assess the association between the aforementioned exposures and eating behaviour. Children breastfed for ≥4 months were less likely to be fussy eaters at 3-6 years compared to those breastfed for <1 month (OR: 0.86 95% CI: 0.76-0.98; p = 0.031). Compared to those children using the traditional/spoon-feeding method, those initiating complementary feeding through BLW or through a mixed approach were more likely to have higher scores on the enjoyment of food (EF) (OR, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.13-1.57; p = 0.001 and 1.17, 1.05-1.30; p = 0.002, respectively) and lower scores on food fussiness (FF) at 3-6 years (0.76, 0.62-0.91; p = 0.004 and 0.87, 0.78-0.98; p = 0.033, respectively). Breastfeeding for ≥4 months and initiation of complementary feeding with the BLW and a mixed approach were associated with greater EF and lower FF, which should endure practice.
Keywords: appetite; breastfeeding; childhood; complementary feeding; eating behaviour; feeding methods; infant.
© 2024 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bocquet, A. , Brancato, S. , Turck, D. , Chalumeau, M. , Darmaun, D. , De Luca, A. , Feillet, F. , Frelut, M. L. , Guimber, D. , Lapillonne, A. , Linglart, A. , Peretti, N. , Rozé, J. C. , Simeoni, U. , Briend, A. , Dupont, C. , & Chouraqui, J. P. (2022). “Baby‐led weaning”: Progress in infant feeding or risky trend? Archives de Pediatrie, 29(7), 516–525. 10.1016/j.arcped.2022.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cameron, S. L. , Taylor, R. W. , & Heath, A. L. M. (2015). Development and pilot testing of Baby‐Led Introduction to SolidS: A version of baby‐led weaning modified to address concerns about iron deficiency, growth faltering and choking. BMC Pediatrics, 15(1), 99. 10.1186/s12887-015-0422-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
