Influence of self-management, self-efficacy, depression and social support on quality of life in patients undergoing haemodialysis by disease stage in South Korea
- PMID: 38853351
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17316
Influence of self-management, self-efficacy, depression and social support on quality of life in patients undergoing haemodialysis by disease stage in South Korea
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the influence of self-management, self-efficacy, depression and social support by disease stage on quality of life in patients undergoing haemodialysis in South Korea.
Design: A cross-sectional survey design was used. Participants completed self-report questionnaires.
Methods: A convenience sample of 409 patients undergoing haemodialysis were recruited to complete self-report questionnaires. T-tests, ANOVA, multiple comparisons with Dunnett's T3 post hoc test, Pearson's correlation coefficients and hierarchical linear multiple regression were conducted using IBM SPSS version 25.0.
Results: The crisis stage group had the highest mean quality of life score (M = 83.92). Factors influencing quality of life were social support and depression in the crisis stage and depression, self-efficacy and self-management in the stable stage, explaining 38.5% and 51.5% of the total variation each. In the downward stage, only depression was a significant predictor of quality of life, explaining 55.9% of it.
Conclusion: Long-term intervention to decrease depression regardless of disease stage to improve quality of life in haemodialysis patients is required. Nursing interventions should include increasing social support to promote patients' quality of life in the crisis stage and improving self-efficacy and self-management in the stable stage.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Based on quality of life predictors, the development and implementation of patient-centered nursing interventions considering the patient's disease stage can improve haemodialysis patients' quality of life.
Impact: There is minimal research on patients' quality of life considering disease stage. Depression was a significant factor of haemodialysis patients' quality of life in all stages, while social support was significant in the crisis stage and self-efficacy and self-management was significant in the stable stage.
Reporting method: This study was reported according to the STROBE checklist.
Patient or public contribution: Validated interviewer-administered questionnaires were completed by patients undergoing haemodialysis in this study.
Keywords: Haemodialysis; depression; disease progression; quality of life; self‐efficacy; self‐management; social support.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Current status and influencing factors of social participation in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis: a Cross-sectional study following the international classification of functioning, disability, and health framework.BMC Nephrol. 2025 Mar 5;26(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04044-z. BMC Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40045294 Free PMC article.
-
A health-related quality of life model for patients undergoing haemodialysis.J Clin Nurs. 2020 Feb;29(3-4):613-625. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15113. Epub 2019 Dec 11. J Clin Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31769547
-
Group intervention to improve quality of life in haemodialysis patients.J Clin Nurs. 2007 Nov;16(11C):268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01963.x. J Clin Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17931320 Clinical Trial.
-
Examining social support, psychological status and health-related quality of life in people receiving haemodialysis.J Ren Care. 2022 Jun;48(2):102-111. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12380. Epub 2021 May 26. J Ren Care. 2022. PMID: 34041850
-
A qualitative meta-synthesis of the essence of patient experiences of dialysis.J Korean Acad Nurs. 2025 Feb;55(1):119-136. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24102. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40012461 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alshraifeen, A., Al‐Rawashdeh, S., Alnuaimi, K., Alzoubi, F., Tanash, M., Ashour, A., & Al‐Ghabeesh, S. (2020). Social support predicted quality of life in people receiving haemodialysis treatment: A cross‐sectional survey. Nursing Open, 7(5), 1517–1525. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.533a
-
- Atapour, A., Nasr, S., Boroujeni, A. M., Taheri, D., & Dolatkhah, S. (2016). A comparison of the quality of life of the patients undergoing hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis and its correlation to the quality of dialysis. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 27(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319‐2442.178259
-
- Barzegar, H., Jafari, H., Charati, J. Y., & Esmaeili, R. (2017). Relationship between duration of dialysis and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 11(4), e6409. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.6409
-
- Bautovich, A., Katz, I., Smith, M., Loo, C. K., & Harvey, S. B. (2014). Depression and chronic kidney disease: A review for clinicians. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(6), 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867414528589
-
- Benetou, S., Tsirigotis, S., Dousis, E., Alikari, V., Evangelou, E., Koutelekos, I., Zartaloudi, A., & Gerogianni, G. (2020). Concerns of hemodialysis patients. Health & Research Journal, 6(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.12681/healthresj.23316
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical